Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29565721›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2018

Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Hopes and Expectations of Family Members.

Kimberly P Garza, Aneta Jedraszko, Lindsey E G Weil, Diana Naranjo, Katharine D Barnard, Lori M B Laffel, Korey K Hood, Jill Weissberg-Benchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovative features and functionalities of an artificial pancreas system: What do youth and parents want?Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kimberly P Garza1 Department of Psychiatry, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois.
Aneta Jedraszko1 Department of Psychiatry, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois.
Lindsey E G Weil2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Diana Naranjo3 Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Katharine D Barnard4 Bournemouth University, Bournemouth , United Kingdom .
Lori M B Laffel5 Joslin Diabetes Center , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Korey K Hood3 Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California.
Jill Weissberg-Benchell1 Department of Psychiatry, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JEAN E. SCHAFFER · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the hopes and expectations that children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes and their families have for new automated insulin delivery systems. The study also aims to examine how the automated insulin delivery system may impact family functioning and individual members' psychosocial adjustment.

methodsForty-eight semistructured focus groups (n = 195) and 89 individual interviews were conducted with children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes and parents and partners. Coders reviewed results in key themes most likely to contain references to the family system. Clusters were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify participants' salient hopes and expectations of how new technology may impact family relationships and individual psychosocial functioning.

resultsThree main themes emerged for participants' hopes and expectations for implementation of the automated insulin delivery system. First, there is an expectation that this diabetes technology will alleviate diabetes-specific worry and burden for the people with diabetes and other family members. Second, there is also hope that this system may reduce day-to-day stress and, third, improve family relationships.

conclusionsThe unique perspective of a broad age group provides insight into how individuals and families creatively address the multiple tasks required in daily diabetes management. Study findings elucidate the very high hopes and expectations held by those managing type 1 diabetes and the impact this new technology may have on family relationships. Awareness of these hopes and expectations is important for developers and clinicians in addressing potential challenges to uptake and to ensure that expectations are set appropriately.

Indexed as

HopeAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleMiddle AgedParentsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinFamily systems.TechnologyType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29565721
PMCPMC6422006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.