ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Composite assessment of power Doppler ultrasonography and MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study of predictive value in radiographic progression after one year.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reappraisal of bone scintigraphy as a new tool for the evaluation of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Quantitative power Doppler signal assessment in the subchondral bone region of the metacarpophalangeal joint is an effective predictor of radiographic progression in the hand of rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePower Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) and MRI are independently useful to predict structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We hypothesize that there is a complementary relationship between these modalities. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate the usefulness of the predictive value of composite assessment of PDUS and contrast-enhanced MRI in radiographic outcomes in patients with RA.
methods20 patients (17 females and 3 males) with RA on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs underwent PDUS and MRI of both hands at baseline. Radiography of the bilateral hands was performed at baseline and at 1 year. Articular synovitis on PDUS was evaluated according to quantitative measurement. Synovitis, bone marrow edema and bone erosion were scored according to the RA MRI scoring method. The changes of joint space narrowing and bone erosion on radiograph were assessed by the Sharp/van der Heijde method. We applied t-statistics to combine the assessment of quantitative PDUS with semiquantitative MRI.
resultsStructural damage progression for radiography was not correlated with any evaluations for MRI, while it showed significant correlation with synovitis on PDUS (r
conclusionComposite assessment of PDUS and MRI may have a stronger predictive value in radiographic progression than PDUS or MRI alone in RA. Advances in knowledge: Composite assessment of PDUS and MRI may be an effective predictor of structural damage in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.