Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29565657›Full record

ArticleChildhood obesity (Print)2018

Childhood Obesity Declines Project: A Different Methodology.

Laura Kettel Khan, Phyllis Ottley, Carole Harris, Nicola Dawkins-Lyn, Carrie Dooyema, Jan Jernigan, Tina Kauh, Deborah Young-Hyman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Childhood obesity (Print), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Kettel Khan1 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Phyllis Ottley2 Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Carole Harris3 Division of Health, Research, Informatics, and Technology, ICF, Atlanta, GA.
Nicola Dawkins-Lyn3 Division of Health, Research, Informatics, and Technology, ICF, Atlanta, GA.
Carrie Dooyema1 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Jan Jernigan1 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Tina Kauh4 Research-Evaluation-Learning Unit, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation , Princeton, NJ.
Deborah Young-Hyman5 Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USICF International (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · USRobert Wood Johnson Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence for and our understanding of community-level strategies such as policies, system, and environmental changes that support healthy eating and active living is growing. However, researchers and evaluation scientists alike are still not confident in what to recommend for preventing or sustaining declines in the prevalence of obesity.

methodsThe Systematic Screening and Assessment (SSA) methodology was adapted as a retrospective process to confirm obesity declines and to better understand what and how policies and programs or interventions may contribute as drivers. The Childhood Obesity Declines (COBD) project's adaptation of the SSA methodology consisted of the following components: (1) establishing and convening an external expert advisory panel; (2) identification and selection of sites reporting obesity declines; (3) confirmation and review of what strategies occurred and contextual factors were present during the period of the obesity decline; and (4) reporting the findings to sites and the field. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The primary result of the COBD project is an in-depth examination of the question, "What happened and how did it happen in communities where the prevalence of obesity declined?" The primary aim of this article is to describe the project's methodology and present its limitations and strengths.

conclusionsExploration of the natural experiments such that occurred in Anchorage, Granville County, New York City, and Philadelphia is the beginning of our understanding of the drivers and contextual factors that may affect childhood obesity. This retrospective examination allows us to: (1) describe targeted interventions; (2) examine the timeline and summarize intervention implementation; (3) document national, state, local, and institutional policies; and (4) examine the influence of the reach and potential multisector layering of interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrevalenceProgram DevelopmentRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescommunity interventionsevaluationmethodsnatural experimentsobesityobesity preventionpolicy

Identifiers

PMID29565657
PMCPMC5865615
OpenAlexW2792018792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.