Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29565656›Full record

ArticleChildhood obesity (Print)2018

The Childhood Obesity Declines Project: Implications for Research and Evaluation Approaches.

Deborah Young-Hyman, Kathryn Morris, Laura Kettel Khan, Nicola Dawkins-Lyn, Carrie Dooyema, Carole Harris, Jan Jernigan, Phyllis Ottley, Tina Kauh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Childhood obesity (Print), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deborah Young-Hyman1 Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD.
Kathryn Morris1 Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD.
Laura Kettel Khan2 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Nicola Dawkins-Lyn3 Division of Health, Research, Informatics, and Technology, ICF, Atlanta, GA.
Carrie Dooyema2 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Carole Harris3 Division of Health, Research, Informatics, and Technology, ICF, Atlanta, GA.
Jan Jernigan2 Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Phyllis Ottley4 Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA.
Tina Kauh5 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation , Princeton, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood obesity remains prevalent and is increasing in some disadvantaged populations. Numerous research, policy and community initiatives are undertaken to impact this pandemic. Understudied are natural experiments. The need to learn from these efforts is paramount. Resulting evidence may not be readily available to inform future research, community initiatives, and policy development/implementation.

methodsWe discuss the implications of using an adaptation of the Systematic Screening and Assessment (SSA) method to evaluate the Childhood Obesity Declines (COBD) project. The project examined successful initiatives, programs and policies in four diverse communities which were concurrent with significant declines in child obesity. In the context of other research designs and evaluation schemas, rationale for use of SSA is presented. Evidence generated by this method is highlighted and guidance suggested for evaluation of future studies of community-based childhood obesity prevention initiatives. Support for the role of stakeholder collaboratives, in particular the National Collaborative on Childhood Obesity Research, as a synergistic vehicle to accelerate research on childhood obesity is discussed. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: SSA mapped active processes and provided contextual understanding of multi-level/component simultaneous efforts to reduce rates of childhood obesity in community settings. Initiatives, programs and policies were not necessarily coordinated. And although direct attribution of intervention/initiative/policy components could not be made, the what, by who, how, to whom was temporally associated with statistically significant reductions in childhood obesity.

conclusionsSSA provides evidence for context and processes which are not often evaluated in other data analytic methods. SSA provides an additional tool to layer with other evaluation approaches.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMalePediatric ObesityPolicy MakingProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchUnited Statescommunity-based experimentsevaluationmethodspopulation-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID29565656
PMCPMC5865611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.