Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29565196›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical research and opinion2018

Developing an instrument to assess patient preferences for benefits and risks of treating acute myeloid leukemia to promote patient-focused drug development.

Jaein Seo, B Douglas Smith, Elihu Estey, Ernest Voyard, Bernadette O' Donoghue, John F P Bridges

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical research and opinion, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05061095 (Understanding What Matters Most to Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05061095 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Understanding What Matters Most to Patients: Establishing the Validity of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey

TypeobservationalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsHematologic NeoplasmsArmsAssessment Surveys, Qualitative Interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Age at Diagnosis and Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in AML: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Meaningful Benefits.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jaein Seoa Department of Health Policy and Management , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
B Douglas Smithb Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Elihu Esteyc Clinical Research Division , Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle , WA , USA.
Ernest Voyarde The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society , Ryebrook , NY , USA.
Bernadette O' Donoghuee The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society , Ryebrook , NY , USA.
John F P Bridgesa Department of Health Policy and Management , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USLeukemia and Lymphoma Society · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

ENHANCING REGULATORY SCIENCE THROUGH A UNIQUE FDA-ACADEMIC PARTNERSHIPU01FD004977 · FDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, G. CALEB · 2014 to 2015
$1.2M
FDA HHS U01 FD004977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a progressive blood cancer with few effective treatment options. As part of a patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiative led by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), this study sought to use a community-centered approach to develop and pilot an instrument to measure patient preferences for the benefits and risks of treating AML. Methods Instrument development was informed by a literature review, engagement with expert stakeholders (n = 12), engagement with community stakeholders, and pre-testing. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE), in which participants made choices between 16 pairs of hypothetical treatments, was developed with five attributes: event-free survival, complete remission, time in hospital, short-term side-effects, and long-term side-effects. A pilot test was conducted and analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results are presented using relative attribute importance (RAI) scores. Results Patients with AML and caregivers were engaged in developing (n = 15), pre-testing (n = 13), and pilot testing (n = 26) the instrument. The pilot included patients with AML (n = 18) and caregivers of living or deceased patients with AML (n = 8). Participants had a mean age of 50 years (range =24-81), and were mostly college educated (n = 22), privately insured (n = 21), and employed (n = 13). Based on the DCE, complete remission was identified as the most important attribute (RAI =10), followed by event-free survival (3.7), time in hospital (2.8), long-term side-effects (2.3), and short-term side-effects (2.1). Conclusion The mixed-methods approach to PFDD was welcomed by all stakeholders and there was strong endorsement to implement this DCE as part of a national survey. Key points for decision makers The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS) initiated an independent effort to promote patient-focused drug development (PFDD). This study presents the development and piloting of a preference study as a first step in this initiative. Results of this pilot study were used to guide a PFDD meeting to discuss the lived experience of patients and caregivers affected by AML. Productive engagement by all patients, caregivers, and stakeholders throughout the process resulted in strong endorsement of the project's approach and recognition of the need to conduct a national study.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversData CollectionDecision MakingDrug DevelopmentFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentAcute myeloid leukemia (AML)Community engagementInstrument developmentStated preference

Identifiers

PMID29565196
PMCPMC8799376
OpenAlexW2793799449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.