Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564634›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2018

[Lumbar CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus of the spinal nerve : Anatomic study and description of a new technique].

G C Feigl, C Mattersberger, W Rosmarin, R Likar, C Avila González

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G C FeiglInstitut für makroskopische und klinische Anatomie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Harrachgasse 21, 8010, Graz, Österreich. georg.feigl@medunigraz.at.
C MattersbergerInstitut für makroskopische und klinische Anatomie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Harrachgasse 21, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
W RosmarinInstitut für makroskopische und klinische Anatomie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Harrachgasse 21, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
R LikarAbteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, LKH Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Österreich.
C Avila GonzálezKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv‑, Palliativ- und Schmerzmedizin, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Deutschland.
Medical University of Graz · ATBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEKlinikum Klagenfurt · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of radiofrequency ablation (RF) of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus in patients with facet joint pain depends on the effective coagulation distance. To date, computed tomography(CT)-guided techniques do not reach the nerve in parallel but rather than punctually. We report a new CT-guided technique to enhance parallelism and proximity of the RF needle to the nerve. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo examiners with different experience with CT-guided procedures in corpses performed all punctures at the lumbar spine on 10 corpses. A RF needle was inserted 1 cm lateral to the spinous process of the vertebra located caudal to the target nerve. The needle was advanced under CT guidance at a flat angle between the superior articular process and the base of the costal or transverse process of the cranial vertebra. The position was verified by dissection. Needle position was judged successful provided the needle could be positioned in the first attempt with no more than one angle correction.

resultsIn 86 out of 100 possible cases (50 per side) at the 5 lumbar segments, the RF needle could be depicted by CT in the target area with no more than one correction of the needle position. Anatomical dissections revealed that 47 out of 86 needles (54.6%) fulfilled the requirements of parallelism and proximity to the nerve. The dorsal ramus was never reached by the RF needle. Higher success rates were obtained in the middle segments compared to the border segments of L1-L2 and L5-S1.

conclusionsWe could demonstrate that the principle of parallelism and proximity of the needle to the nerve could be fulfilled with this new technique; however, needle positioning requires practice due to the oblique puncture direction.

Indexed as

Lumbosacral RegionRadiofrequency AblationSpinal NervesHumansLumbar VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedFacet joint painMedial branchRadiofrequency ablationRadiofrequency denervationThermocoagulation

Identifiers

PMID29564634
OpenAlexW2791017297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.