Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564631›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2018

Virulent gene profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from cattle and camels in Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria.

Musa Sakuma Adamu, Iniobong Chukwuebuka Ikenna Ugochukwu, Sunday Idoko Idoko, Yakubu Adamu Kwabugge, Nafisatu Sa'ad Abubakar, James Ameh Ameh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. First Isolation and Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance ofAccess microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Musa Sakuma AdamuDepartment of Animal Health and Production Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, P.M.B 35, Nigeria.
Iniobong Chukwuebuka Ikenna UgochukwuDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. iniobong.ugochukwu@unn.edu.ng.
Sunday Idoko IdokoDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Yakubu Adamu KwabuggeDepartment of Animal Health Technology, Adamawa College of Agriculture, Ganye, Adamawa State, PMB 2088, Nigeria.
Nafisatu Sa'ad AbubakarDepartment of Animal Health and Production Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State, P.M.B 35, Nigeria.
James Ameh AmehDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
The Federal Polytechnic, Ado-Ekiti · NGUniversity of Abuja · NGAdamawa State University · NGUniversity of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevalence and distribution of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups from the faecal samples of cattle and camels slaughter in Maiduguri abattoir and their antibiotic resistance profile of the isolates were determined. The highest prevalence (24%) was recorded in the month of September and more STEC isolates came from cattle than the camels. There was significant (P < 0.05) seasonal trend in the prevalence of STEC among cattle and camel with more cases recorded during the wet season. Although, the study did not demonstrate significant influence of sex from the various sources. The serogroups recorded in this study were O157, O26, O91, O103 and O111. There was no significant difference (P < 0.05) between the detection rates of serogroups. The serogroup O26 was significantly (P < 0.05) the most observed serogroup in both camels and cattle. None of the STEC isolates tested positive for the O45 serogroup. PCR assays shows that 50 (63.3%) of the 86 STEC isolates carried the stx2 gene, 34 (43%) possessed the stx1 gene, and 14 (16.3%) carried both stx1 and stx2 genes. Other genes detected include eae and ehlyA. The antimicrobial resistance among the STEC O157 and non-O157 isolates from cattle and camels in Maiduguri abattoir were very high and the STEC isolates were resistant to at least one or more of the antimicrobial agents tested. There was also multidrug resistance with the most frequent occurring patterns been ampicillin/nalidixic acid and tetracycline/trimethoprim. However, all the 79 isolates were sensitive to chloramphenicol, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone; therefore, these drugs could be drugs of choice in the treatment of STEC infections.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAbattoirsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCamelusCattleCattle DiseasesEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsFecesFemaleMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNigeriaPrevalenceSerogroupAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsVirulence FactorsAntibiotic resistanceCamelsCattleShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coliVirulent gene

Identifiers

PMID29564631
OpenAlexW2794080447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.