Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564593›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2018

Advances in heart failure therapy in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Stefan Rupp, Christian Jux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Managing heart failure in dialysis patients.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan RuppPediatric Heart Center, University of Giessen and Marburg, Feulgenstrasse 12, 35390, Giessen, Germany. stefan.rupp@paediat.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9435-929X
Christian JuxPediatric Heart Center, University of Giessen and Marburg, Feulgenstrasse 12, 35390, Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While in adults major advances in heart failure therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were documented in the last two decades, research on the mechanism and therapies of heart failure in children with left ventricular dilated cardiomyopathy has lagged behind. Despite the lack of sufficient randomized prospective studies, ACE inhibitors are first line and ß-receptor antagonists are second-line strategies in children. Following the adult guidelines, without having data concerning the pediatric population, mineral corticoids are also accepted in the treatment of pediatric heart failure, while diuretics should only be used to achieve a euvolemic status. In cases of complete left bundle bunch block or prolonged QRS duration, cardiac resynchronization is an option. If these instruments are exploited, and the child is still listed for heart transplantation as destination, evolving therapies like pulmonary artery banding in cases of preserved right ventricular function and cardiac cell therapy in cases of localized ventricular dysfunction might represent additional treatment options. This review summarizes the actual guidelines and provides an outlook for evolving therapies.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiomyopathy, DilatedCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyChildHeart FailureHumansLigationPulmonary ArteryStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftCardiac cell therapyDilated cardiomyopathyHeart failurePediatricsPulmonary artery banding

Identifiers

PMID29564593
OpenAlexW2793516708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.