Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564491›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2018

The incidence of hip dislocation and suture failure according to two different types of posterior soft tissue repair techniques in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Jun-Ki Moon, Yeesuk Kim, Kyu-Tae Hwang, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Young-Ho Kim

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (34,020 Patients): What Have We Learnt?Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Ki MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Gyomoon-dong 249-1, Guri city, Gyunggi-do, 471-701, South Korea.
Yeesuk KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyu-Tae HwangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae-Hyuk YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Gyomoon-dong 249-1, Guri city, Gyunggi-do, 471-701, South Korea.
Young-Ho KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Gyomoon-dong 249-1, Guri city, Gyunggi-do, 471-701, South Korea. kimyh1@hanyang.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-2989-7494
Hanyang University Guri Hospital · KRHanyang University Seoul Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough the posterolateral approach for hip arthroplasty is popular and has numerous advantages, it has been known to have a propensity for dislocation. The repair of short external rotator muscles with capsule is important for reducing dislocation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of suture failure, dislocation, and time to failure for two repair techniques for posterior soft tissue repair during total hip arthroplasty.

methodsIn this study of 167 total hip arthroplasties in 159 patients, we reattached the short external rotator tendon with posterior capsule to the greater trochanter transosseously (tendon-to-bone, 87 hips) or the gluteus medius tendon (tendon-to-tendon, 80 hips). Radiopaque markers were attached to each suture side < 1.2 cm apart. The distance between the markers was radiographically measured at variable time points postoperatively. Failure was defined by a distance between markers of ≥ 2.5 cm or marker invisibility. The mean follow-up period was 28.8 (12-45) months.

resultsSuture failure was observed less frequently in the tendon-to-bone group (18.4%) than in the tendon-to-tendon group (65%; p < 0.001). Failure mostly occurred within two weeks post-operatively: 93.8% for tendon-to-bone repair (p < 0.001) and 90.4% for tendon-to-tendon repair (p = 0.025). The dislocation rate was significantly higher in the tendon-to-tendon group (7. vs 1.1%; p = 0.041). A significant correlation was observed between suture failure and dislocation (p = 0.013).

conclusionsTendon-to-bone repair is superior to tendon-to-tendon repair based on lower suture failure and dislocation rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHip DislocationHip JointHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSuturesTendonsPosterior soft tissueShort external rotatorTendon-to-bone repair techniqueTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID29564491
OpenAlexW2790984032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.