Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564473›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2018

[Palliative medicine in emergency medical services].

M Roessler, N Eulitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M RoesslerKlinik für Anästhesiologie - Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. m.roessler@med.uni-goettingen.de.
N EulitzMedizinische Klinik - Palliativmedizin, DRK-Kliniken Nordhessen - Standort Wehlheiden, Hansteinstraße 29, Kassel, 34121, Hessen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scope of emergency calls for emergency medical services staffed by an emergency physician (EMS-EP) includes calls to patients with life-limiting diseases. Symptom exacerbation as well as psychosocial overburdening of caring relatives are the most frequent reasons for activation of an EMS-EP. Pain crises, acute dyspnea, massive bleeding and/or an impending or overt cardiac arrest are the most frequent symptom exacerbations. Under the conditions of a prehospital emergency physician mission, particular challenges are the evaluation of the overall situation, the prognosis and the presumed will of the patient. Is the goal of treatment still rehabilitative or is the patient in a pre-terminal, terminal or even final condition? Is the goal of treatment the same for the patient, the relatives and the physician? Is it necessary to make the goal of treatment a subject of discussion? It is not unusual that the task of the EMS-EP is to deliver bad news to the relatives, such as the impending death of the patient or even that death has already occurred. Even though it may no longer be required to save a life, the EMS-EP can significantly influence the bereavement of the relatives. Saving life might not be paramount for the EMS when responding to emergency calls from palliative care patients. Nevertheless, it is an important field of activity for the EMS-EP since the burden of symptoms can be relieved and dying with dignity can be made possible.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesPalliative MedicineHumansPain ManagementPalliative CarePhysiciansEmergency medical servicesEmergeny medical services emergency physicianPalliative carePalliative medicineSymptom exacerbation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.