Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564308›Full record

ReviewObstetrics & gynecology science2018

Clinical assessment of the male fertility.

Amena Khatun, Md Saidur Rahman, Myung-Geol Pang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06147700 (Identifying Molecular Determinants of Infertility in Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06147700 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Identifying Molecular Determinants of Infertility in Men (MODIFY)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), SingaporeRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsMale Infertility
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register: Suitable to Study Paternal Drug Exposures?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amena KhatunDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.
Md Saidur RahmanDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.
Myung-Geol PangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-3789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of infertility in males consists of physical examination and semen analyses. Standardized semen analyses depend on the descriptive analysis of sperm motility, morphology, and concentration, with a threshold level that must be surpassed to be considered a fertile spermatozoon. Nonetheless, these conventional parameters are not satisfactory for clinicians since 25% of infertility cases worldwide remain unexplained. Therefore, newer tests methods have been established to investigate sperm physiology and functions by monitoring characteristics such as motility, capacitation, the acrosome reaction, reactive oxygen species, sperm DNA damage, chromatin structure, zona pellucida binding, and sperm-oocyte fusion. After the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, sperm maturity, morphology, and aneuploidy conditions have gotten more attention for investigating unexplained male infertility. In the present article, recent advancements in research regarding the utilization of male fertility prediction tests and their role and accuracy are reviewed.

Indexed as

InfertilitySemen analysisSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID29564308
PMCPMC5854897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.