Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564213›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2018

Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics.

Man Hung, Jerry Bounsanga, Maren W Voss, Charles L Saltzman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04886960 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) vs. Sterile Amniotic Fluid for Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2021 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsOsteo Arthritis KneeArmsAmniotic Fluid Injection, Standard of Care
NCT06498453 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation With Trak in Patients With Knee or Shoulder Pathology.

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrak Health Solutions S.L.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsShoulder Injury, Knee InjuryArmsTrak-Physio knee condition, Trak-Physio in shoulder condition, Knee conventional rehabilitation program, Shoulder conventional rehabilitation program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Balancing Safety and Efficacy: Uncemented Versus Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Man HungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Jerry BounsangaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Maren W VossDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Charles L SaltzmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo establish minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for measurements in an orthopaedic patient population with joint disorders.

methodsAdult patients aged 18 years and older seeking care for joint conditions at an orthopaedic clinic took the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS

resultsThere were 2226 patients who participated with a mean age of 61.16 (SD = 12.84) years, 41.6% male, and 89.7% Caucasian. Mean change ranged from 7.29 to 8.41 for the PROMIS

conclusionThis is the first comprehensive study providing a wide range of MCIDs for the PROMIS

Indexed as

ArthroplastyClinical outcomesHhip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstructionJointKnee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstructionMinimum clinically important differenceMinimum detectable changeOrthopaedicsPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical FunctionPhysical function

Identifiers

PMID29564213
PMCPMC5859199
OpenAlexW2789751163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.