Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564163›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2018

Performance-based financing in low-income and middle-income countries: isn't it time for a rethink?

Elisabeth Paul, Lucien Albert, Badibanga N'Sambuka Bisala, Oriane Bodson, Emmanuel Bonnet, Paul Bossyns, Sandro Colombo, Vincent De Brouwere, Alexandre Dumont, Dieudonné Sèdjro Eclou and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing the role of innovative financing in global health.Global health research and policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reorienting health systems towards Primary Health Care in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Elisabeth PaulTax Institute, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-4093
Lucien AlbertInternational Health Unit, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Badibanga N'Sambuka BisalaExpert in district health systems based on primary healthcare, Groupe d'Appui à la Recherche et Enseignement en Santé Publique, Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Oriane BodsonFaculty of Social Sciences, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Emmanuel BonnetRésiliences, Research Institute for Development (IRD), Bondy, France.
Paul BossynsHealth Sector Thematic Unit, Belgian Development Agency (ENABEL), Brussels, Belgium.
Sandro ColomboIndependent Consultant, Madrid, Spain.
Vincent De BrouwereDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Alexandre DumontCEPED, Research Institute for Development (IRD), Paris Descartes University, INSERM, Paris, France.
Dieudonné Sèdjro EclouLADYD, Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Karel GyselinckHealth Sector Thematic Unit, Belgian Development Agency (ENABEL), Brussels, Belgium.
Fatoumata HaneDepartment of Sociology, Université Assane Seck, Ziguinchor, Senegal.
Bruno MarchalDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Remo MeloniIndependent Consultant, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mathieu NoirhommeIndependent Consultant, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre NotermanIndependent Consultant, Bunia, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Gorik OomsDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-0128
Oumar Mallé SambGlobal Health, Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Freddie SsengoobaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Laurence TouréAnthropologist, Research Association Miseli, Bamako, Mali.
Anne-Marie Turcotte-TremblayUniversity of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sara Van BelleDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Philippe VinardAlter Santé Internationale, Montpellier, France.
Valéry RiddeCEPED, Research Institute for Development (IRD), Paris Descartes University, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper questions the view that performance-based financing (PBF) in the health sector is an effective, efficient and equitable approach to improving the performance of health systems in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). PBF was conceived as an open approach adapted to specific country needs, having the potential to foster system-wide reforms. However, as with many strategies and tools, there is a gap between what was planned and what is actually implemented. This paper argues that PBF as it is currently implemented in many contexts does not satisfy the promises. First, since the start of PBF implementation in LMICs, concerns have been raised on the basis of empirical evidence from different settings and disciplines that indicated the risks, cost and perverse effects. However, PBF implementation was rushed despite insufficient evidence of its effectiveness. Second, there is a lack of domestic ownership of PBF. Considering the amounts of time and money it now absorbs, and the lack of evidence of effectiveness and efficiency, PBF can be characterised as a donor fad. Third, by presenting itself as a comprehensive approach that makes it possible to address all aspects of the health system in any context, PBF monopolises attention and focuses policy dialogue on the short-term results of PBF programmes while diverting attention and resources from broader processes of change and necessary reforms. Too little care is given to system-wide and long-term effects, so that PBF can actually damage health services and systems. This paper ends by proposing entry points for alternative approaches.

Indexed as

health policyhealth systems

Identifiers

PMID29564163
PMCPMC5859812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.