ArticleBMJ global health2018
Thailand's national universal developmental screening programme for young children: action research for improved follow-up.
Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Parenting Programs for Southeast Asian Families.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Determinants of health literacy in early childhood care among marginalized ethnic communities: a cross-sectional study in three border provinces of Thailand.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Teacher Coaching Versus Parent-Implemented Intervention for Preschoolers at Risk of Developmental Delay in Thailand.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Enhancing Pediatric Outpatient Medical Services Through the Implementation of the Smart Well Child Center Application.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Suspected Developmental Delay in Thai Children Born with Low Birth Weight or Asphyxia.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Autism in Taiwan and Thailand: Influences of Culture.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024Review
- Feasibility and Acceptability of an ABCD Program for Child Development Among Skipped Families in Rural Thailand: A Pilot Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- First anesthesia exposure effects on short-term neurocognitive function among 1- to 36-month-old children: a case-control pilot study.Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
- Global child and adolescent mental health perspectives: bringing change locally, while thinking globally.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2022Article
- From the lab to the field: acceptability of using electroencephalography with Indian preschool children.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- A Family-Centered Intervention to Monitor Children's Development in a Pediatric Outpatient Setting: Design and Feasibility Testing.Frontiers in health services · 2021Article
- Determinants of Language Development in 18-Month-Old Children within Primary Healthcare Settings.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn low-income and middle-income countries, it is estimated that one in every three preschool-age children are failing to meet cognitive or socioemotional developmental milestones. Thailand has implemented a universal national developmental screening programme (DSPM) for young children to enable detection of developmental disorders and early intervention that can improve child health outcomes. DSPM implementation is being hampered by low attendance at follow-up appointments when children fail the initial screening.
methodsAction research, using qualitative methods was conducted with 19 caregivers, 5 health workers and 1 chief at two Health Promotion Hospitals to explore the factors affecting attendance at follow-up appointments. Transcripts and notes were analysed using descriptive content analysis. Findings were then discussed with 48 health workers, managers, researchers and policymakers.
resultsThe high workload of health workers during busy vaccination clinics, and inadequate materials prevented clear communication with caregivers about the screening, how to stimulate child development and the screening result. Caregivers, particularly grandparents, had a lack of understanding about how to stimulate child development, and did not fully understand failed screening results. Caregivers felt blamed for not stimulating their child's development, and were either worried that their child was severely disabled, or they did not believe the screening result and therefore questioned its usefulness. This led to a lack of attendance at follow-up appointments.
conclusionTask-sharing, mobile health (mhealth), community outreach and targeted interventions for grandparent caregivers might increase awareness about child development and screening, and allow health workers more time to communicate effectively. Sharing best practices, communication training and mentoring of DSPM workers coupled with mhealth job aids could also improve caregiver attendance at follow-up. Engagement of caregivers in understanding the barriers to attendance at follow-up and engagement of stakeholders in the design and implementation of interventions is important to ensure their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.