Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29564121›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2018

Effects of dietary

Yue Li, Hao Zhang, Weipeng Su, Zhixiong Ying, Yueping Chen, Lili Zhang, Zhaoxin Lu, Tian Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Porcine intestinal goblet cells: Guardians of mucosal immunity and barrier function.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue Li1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Hao Zhang1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Weipeng Su1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Zhixiong Ying1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Yueping Chen1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Lili Zhang1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Zhaoxin Lu2College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Tian Wang1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095 China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe focus of recent research has been directed toward the probiotic potential of

methodsEighteen litters of newborn piglets were selected at birth, with one normal birth weight (NBW) and two IUGR piglets in each litter (i.e., 18 NBW and 36 IUGR piglets in total). At weaning, the NBW piglet and one of the IUGR piglets were assigned to groups fed a control diet (i.e., the NBW-CON and IUGR-CON groups). The other IUGR piglet was assigned to a group fed the control diet supplemented with 2.0 g BA per kg of diet (i.e., IUGR-BA group). The piglets were thus distributed across three groups for a four-week period.

resultsIUGR reduced the growth performance of the IUGR-CON piglets compared with the NBW-CON piglets. It was also associated with decreased villus sizes, increased apoptosis rates, reduced goblet cell numbers, and an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the small intestine. Supplementation with BA improved the average daily weight gain and the feed efficiency of the IUGR-BA group compared with the IUGR-CON group (

conclusionsDietary supplementation with BA improves morphology, decreases inflammatory response, and regulates microbiota in the small intestines of IUGR piglets, which may contribute to improved growth performance during early life.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBacillus amyloliquefaciensImmune statusIntra-uterine growth retardationMicrobiotaPigletSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID29564121
PMCPMC5848560
OpenAlexW2789748083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.