ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2018
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
169 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of gut microbiome reveals patterns of dysbiosis in colorectal cancer patients.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Nutraceuticals in the Modulation of the Intestinal Microbiota: Current Status and Future Directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Detection of Fusobaterium nucleatum in feces and colorectal mucosa as a risk factor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The effect of periodontal bacteria infection on incidence and prognosis of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Role of the intestinal microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery outcomes.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Pooled it
- A joint mixture Tobit method with latent microbial abundance improves detection of microbiome-disease associations in zero-inflated data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Gut microbiome profiles in Chilean participants with colorectal adenomas: an exploratory 16S rRNA sequencing study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Phylum Fusobacteriota Is Associated with Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality: Results from the Translational Research Program in Cancer Differences across Populations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Environmentally mediated interactions predict community assembly and invasion success in a gut microbiota synthetic community.mSystems · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Profiling gut microbiota of colorectal cancer in Indonesia: a focus on beneficial taxa depletion.Gut pathogens · 2026Article
- Isolation of Fusobacterium nucleatum-Induced Host Exosomal sRNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- ModellingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Microbial dysbiosis drives colorectal carcinogenesis via integrated inflammatory, metabolic, and biofilm pathways.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Interplay between pathogen-mediated immune evasion and innate immune negative regulation in gastrointestinal tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Vendor-specific microbiomes influence oral cancer development and its response toJournal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Role of Gut Microbiome in Oncogenesis and Oncotherapies.Cancers · 2025Review
109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.