ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018
Human-Human Interaction Forces and Interlimb Coordination During Side-by-Side Walking With Hand Contact.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sophisticated use of upper limb haptic interactions during adaptive locomotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Haptic communication and interpersonal dynamics in hand-by-hand guided locomotion in children and adults.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- In sync with oneself: spontaneous intrapersonal coordination and the effect of cognitive load.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Development of a Personal Guide Robot That Leads a Guest Hand-in-Hand While Keeping a Distance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-force human-human hand interactions induce gait changes through sensorimotor engagement instead of direct mechanical effects.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spinal maps of motoneuron activity during human locomotion: neuromechanical considerations.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Restoring walking ability in older adults with arm-in-arm gait training: study protocol for the AAGaTT randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Virtual social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic: the effect of interpersonal motor synchrony on social interactions in the virtual space.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Humans modulate arm stiffness to facilitate motor communication during overground physical human-robot interaction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Spontaneous gait phase synchronization of human to a wheeled mobile robot with replicating gait-induced upper body oscillating motion.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Interacting humans use forces in specific frequencies to exchange information by touch.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Walking paths during collaborative carriages do not follow the simple rules observed in the locomotion of single walking subjects.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- A link between social isolation during the coronavirus outbreak and social alignment in balcony parties.PloS one · 2022Article
- Sensing small interaction forces through proprioception.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Brief Report: Classification of Autistic Traits According to Brain Activity Recoded by fNIRS Using ε-Complexity Coefficients.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021Article
- The Potential Role of Dopamine in Mediating Motor Function and Interpersonal Synchrony.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Spontaneous Interpersonal Synchronization of Gait: A Systematic Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021Review
- Trends in Haptic Communication of Human-Human Dyads: Toward Natural Human-Robot Co-manipulation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handholding can naturally occur between two walkers. When people walk side-by-side, either with or without hand contact, they often synchronize their steps. However, despite the importance of haptic interaction in general and the natural use of hand contact between humans during walking, few studies have investigated forces arising from physical interactions. Eight pairs of adult subjects participated in this study. They walked on side-by-side treadmills at 4 km/h independently and with hand contact. Only hand contact-related sensory information was available for unintentional synchronization, while visual and auditory communication was obstructed. Subjects walked at their natural cadences or following a metronome. Limb kinematics, hand contact 3D interaction forces and EMG activity of 12 upper limb muscles were recorded. Overall, unintentional step frequency locking was observed during about 40% of time in 88% of pairs walking with hand contact. On average, the amplitude of contact arm oscillations decreased while the contralateral (free) arm oscillated in the same way as during normal walking. Interestingly, EMG activity of the shoulder muscles of the contact arm did not decrease, and their synergistic pattern remained similar. The amplitude of interaction forces and of trunk oscillations was similar for synchronized and non-synchronized steps, though the synchronized steps were characterized by significantly more regular orientations of interaction forces. Our results further support the notion that gait synchronization during natural walking is common, and that it may occur through interaction forces. Conservation of the proximal muscle activity of the contact (not oscillating) arm is consistent with neural coupling between cervical and lumbosacral pattern generation circuitries ("quadrupedal" arm-leg coordination) during human gait. Overall, the findings suggest that individuals might integrate force interaction cues to communicate and coordinate steps during walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.