Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29563266›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Male spiders control offspring sex ratio through greater production of female-determining sperm.

Bram Vanthournout, Mette Marie Busck, Jesper Bechsgaard, Frederik Hendrickx, Andreas Schramm, Trine Bilde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex differences in spiders: from phenotype to genomics.Development genes and evolution · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence for Faster X Chromosome Evolution in Spiders.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bram VanthournoutDepartment of Bioscience, Section for Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-9092
Mette Marie BusckDepartment of Bioscience, Section for Microbiology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-7152
Jesper BechsgaardDepartment of Bioscience, Section for Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Frederik HendrickxBiology Department, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Andreas SchrammDepartment of Bioscience, Section for Microbiology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7614-9616
Trine BildeDepartment of Bioscience, Section for Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark trine.bilde@bios.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-161X

Funding

European Research Council 282163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that when sons and daughters have different reproductive values, parents should adjust offspring sex ratio towards the sex with the higher fitness return. Haplo-diploid species directly control offspring sex ratio, but species with chromosomal sex determination (CSD) were presumed to be constrained by Mendelian segregation. There is now increasing evidence that CSD species can adjust sex ratio strategically, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood. One hypothesis states that adaptive control is more likely to evolve in the heterogametic sex through a bias in gamete production. We investigated this hypothesis in males as the heterogametic sex in two social spider species that consistently show adaptive female-biased sex ratio and in one subsocial species that is characterized by equal sex ratio. We quantified the production of male (0) and female (X) determining sperm cells using flow cytometry, and show that males of social species produce significantly more X-carrying sperm than 0-sperm, on average 70%. This is consistent with the production of more daughters. Males of the subsocial species produced a significantly lower bias of 54% X-carrying sperm. We also investigated whether inter-genomic conflict between hosts and their endosymbionts may explain female bias. Next generation sequencing showed that five common genera of bacterial endosymbionts known to affect sex ratio are largely absent, ruling out that endosymbiont bacteria bias sex ratio in social spiders. Our study provides evidence for paternal control over sex allocation through biased gamete production as a mechanism by which the heterogametic sex in CSD species adaptively adjust offspring sex ratio.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesSex RatioAnimalsCell NucleusChromosomes, InsectFemaleFluorescent DyesLinear ModelsMaleMicrobiotaPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpermatozoaSpidersFluorescent DyesPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sflow cytometrymicrobiomesex allocationsex ratiosocial spidersperm

Identifiers

PMID29563266
PMCPMC5897641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.