Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29563222›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2018

Enhancing photosynthesis in plants: the light reactions.

Tanai Cardona, Shengxi Shao, Peter J Nixon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Physiological and Yield Responses of Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disrupted HPlant molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanai CardonaDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building - Wolfson Laboratories, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Shengxi ShaoDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building - Wolfson Laboratories, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Peter J NixonDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building - Wolfson Laboratories, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. p.nixon@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N016807/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we highlight recent research and current ideas on how to improve the efficiency of the light reactions of photosynthesis in crops. We note that the efficiency of photosynthesis is a balance between how much energy is used for growth and the energy wasted or spent protecting the photosynthetic machinery from photodamage. There are reasons to be optimistic about enhancing photosynthetic efficiency, but many appealing ideas are still on the drawing board. It is envisioned that the crops of the future will be extensively genetically modified to tailor them to specific natural or artificial environmental conditions.

Indexed as

LightPhotosynthesisAdenosine TriphosphateCrops, AgriculturalPhotosynthetic Reaction Center Complex ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatePhotosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteinsantennabiomassefficiencyphotoprotectionphotosynthesisphotosystems

Identifiers

PMID29563222
PMCPMC5897789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.