Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29563198›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018

Assessment of 30/20-Microgram Disk Content versus MIC Results for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Helio S Sader, Paul R Rhomberg, Michael D Huband, Ian A Critchley, Gregory G Stone, Robert K Flamm, Ronald N Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Application of Rapid Detection Method Based on NG-Test® CARBA 5 in Bloodstream Infections Associated With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helio S SaderJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA helio-sader@jmilabs.com.
Paul R RhombergJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Michael D HubandJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Ian A CritchleyAllergan plc, Irvine, California, USA.
Gregory G StonePfizer Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Robert K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Ronald N JonesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
JMI Laboratories · USAllergan (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the correlation between MIC and disk diffusion inhibition zones when testing ceftazidime-avibactam, using the 30/20-μg disk and the disk diffusion and MIC breakpoints established by the U.S. FDA and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Organisms used included 2 groups of

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug CombinationsEnterobacteriaceaeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeDrug Combinationsbroth microdilutiondisk diffusionerror rate-bounded method

Identifiers

PMID29563198
PMCPMC5971542
OpenAlexW2794319825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.