Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29563167›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

Genome-wide determinants of sequence-specific DNA binding of general regulatory factors.

Matthew J Rossi, William K M Lai, B Franklin Pugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J RossiCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
William K M LaiCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
B Franklin PughCenter for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

Funding

Promoter Regulation in Response to Environmental StressR01ES013768 · NIEHS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI PUGH, B FRANKLIN · 2007 to 2019
$4.9M
An in vitro Genome-wide Study of Chromatin Structure and Transcription RegulationF32CA168104 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ROSSI, MATTHEW JOHN · 2012 to 2014
$156k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA168104NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General regulatory factors (GRFs), such as Reb1, Abf1, Rap1, Mcm1, and Cbf1, positionally organize yeast chromatin through interactions with a core consensus DNA sequence. It is assumed that sequence recognition via direct base readout suffices for specificity and that spurious nonfunctional sites are rendered inaccessible by chromatin. We tested these assumptions through genome-wide mapping of GRFs in vivo and in purified biochemical systems at near-base pair (bp) resolution using several ChIP-exo-based assays. We find that computationally predicted DNA shape features (e.g., minor groove width, helix twist, base roll, and propeller twist) that are not defined by a unique consensus sequence are embedded in the nonunique portions of GRF motifs and contribute critically to sequence-specific binding. This dual source specificity occurs at GRF sites in promoter regions where chromatin organization starts. Outside of promoter regions, strong consensus sites lack the shape component and consequently lack an intrinsic ability to bind cognate GRFs, without regard to influences from chromatin. However, sites having a weak consensus and low intrinsic affinity do exist in these regions but are rendered inaccessible in a chromatin environment. Thus, GRF site-specificity is achieved through integration of favorable DNA sequence and shape readouts in promoter regions and by chromatin-based exclusion from fortuitous weak sites within gene bodies. This study further revealed a severe G/C nucleotide cross-linking selectivity inherent in all formaldehyde-based ChIP assays, which includes ChIP-seq. However, for most tested proteins, G/C selectivity did not appreciably affect binding site detection, although it does place limits on the quantitativeness of occupancy levels.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsChromatinConsensus SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsGenome, FungalMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsShelterin ComplexTelomere-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsABF1 protein, S cerevisiaeBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCBF1 protein, S cerevisiaeChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsMCM1 protein, S cerevisiaeMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinRAP1 protein, S cerevisiaeREB1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsShelterin ComplexTelomere-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29563167
PMCPMC5880240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.