Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29562917›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018

The use of mid-regional proadrenomedullin to identify disease severity and treatment response to sepsis - a secondary analysis of a large randomised controlled trial.

Gunnar Elke, Frank Bloos, Darius Cameron Wilson, Frank Martin Brunkhorst, Josef Briegel, Konrad Reinhart, Markus Loeffler, Stefan Kluge, Axel Nierhaus, Ulrich Jaschinski and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07715110 (Biological and Immunomodulatory Effect of Hemoadsorption With Macroporous Resin Cartridges in Septic Shock and Refractory Septic Shock Two Parallel Open-label Randomized Pilot Trials.), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07715110 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Biological and Immunomodulatory Effect of Hemoadsorption With Macroporous Resin Cartridges in Septic Shock and Refractory Septic Shock Two Parallel Open-label Randomized Pilot Trials.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMiguel Sanchez GarciaRan2027 to 2029Enrolled16ConditionsSeptic Shock, Vasopressor Resistance, Multiple Organ Dysfunction, Sepsis, HemoperfusionArmsHemoadsorption cartridge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Infectious Causes for Elevated Procalcitonin.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Towards a holistic approach to pulmonary infections. Insights from the Sixth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2024.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Gunnar ElkeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus 12, 24105, Kiel, Germany. gunnar.elke@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4948-1605
Frank BloosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Darius Cameron WilsonB·R·A·H·M·S GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Neuendorfstr. 25, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Frank Martin BrunkhorstDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Josef BriegelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Markus LoefflerClinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Axel NierhausDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich JaschinskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas WeylandUniversity Department for Anesthesia, Intensive and Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, Hospital Oldenburg, Rahel-Straus-Str. 10, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany.
Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
SepNet Critical Care Trials Group
Universität Hamburg · DEBDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMünchen Klinik · DEJena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Oldenburg · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study assessed the ability of mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in comparison to conventional biomarkers (procalcitonin (PCT), lactate, C-reactive protein) and clinical scores to identify disease severity in patients with sepsis.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock across 33 German intensive care units. The association between biomarkers and clinical scores with mortality was assessed by Cox regression analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were stratified into three severity groups (low, intermediate, high) for all biomarkers and scores based on cutoffs with either a 90% sensitivity or specificity.

results1089 patients with a 28-day mortality rate of 26.9% were analysed. According to the Sepsis-3 definition, 41.2% and 58.8% fulfilled the criteria for sepsis and septic shock, with respective mortality rates of 20.0% and 32.1%. MR-proADM had the strongest association with mortality across all Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 subgroups and could facilitate a more accurate classification of low (e.g. MR-proADM vs. SOFA: N = 265 vs. 232; 9.8% vs. 13.8% mortality) and high (e.g. MR-proADM vs. SOFA: N = 161 vs. 155; 55.9% vs. 41.3% mortality) disease severity. Patients with decreasing PCT concentrations of either ≥ 20% (baseline to day 1) or ≥ 50% (baseline to day 4) but continuously high MR-proADM concentrations had a significantly increased mortality risk (HR (95% CI): 19.1 (8.0-45.9) and 43.1 (10.1-184.0)).

conclusionsMR-proADM identifies disease severity and treatment response more accurately than established biomarkers and scores, adding additional information to facilitate rapid clinical decision-making and improve personalised sepsis treatment.

Indexed as

PrognosisAdrenomedullinAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEBiomarkersCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLactic AcidLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresAdrenomedullinBiomarkersCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinLactic Acidmid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, humanPeptide FragmentsProtein PrecursorsBiomarkersMortalityMR-proADMSepsisSeptic shockSOFA

Identifiers

PMID29562917
PMCPMC5863464
OpenAlexW2797283758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.