Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29562877›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2018

Experiences of ICU survivors in a low middle income country- a multicenter study.

Lalitha Pieris, Ponsuge Chathurani Sigera, Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De Silva, Sithum Munasinghe, Aasiyah Rashan, Priyantha Lakmini Athapattu, Kosala Saroj Amarasiri Jayasinghe, Kerstein Samarasinghe, Abi Beane, Arjen M Dondorp and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Lived Experiences of COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Survivors.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lalitha PierisSri Lanka Nursing Council, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ponsuge Chathurani SigeraNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De SilvaNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sithum MunasingheNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Aasiyah RashanNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Priyantha Lakmini AthapattuOffice of Director Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Kosala Saroj Amarasiri JayasingheFaculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Kerstein SamarasingheDepartment of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Abi BeaneNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Arjen M DondorpMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Bangkok, Thailand.
Rashan HaniffaNetwork for Improving Critical care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka. rashan@nicslk.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7192-0598
National Hospital of Sri Lanka · LKUniversity of Oxford · GBKristianstad University · SEMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THUniversity of Colombo · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStressful patient experiences during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay is associated with reduced satisfaction in High Income Countries (HICs) but has not been explored in Lower and Middle Income Countries (LMICs). This study describes the recalled experiences, stress and satisfaction as perceived by survivors of ICUs in a LMIC.

methodsThis follow-up study was carried out in 32 state ICUs in Sri Lanka between July and December 2015.ICU survivors' experiences, stress factors encountered and level of satisfaction were collected 30 days after ICU discharge by a telephone questionnaire adapted from Granja and Wright.

resultsOf 1665 eligible ICU survivors, 23.3% died after ICU discharge, 49.1% were uncontactable and 438 (26.3%) patients were included in the study. Whilst 78.1% (n = 349) of patients remembered their admission to the hospital, only 42.3% (n = 189) could recall their admission to the ICU. The most frequently reported stressful experiences were: being bedridden (34.2%), pain (34.0%), general discomfort (31.7%), daily needle punctures (32.9%), family worries (33.6%), fear of dying and uncertainty in the future (25.8%). The majority of patients (376, 84.12%) found the atmosphere of the ICU to be friendly and calm. Overall, the patients found the level of health care received in the ICU to be "very satisfactory" (93.8%, n = 411) with none of the survivors stating they were either "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied".

conclusionIn common with HIC, survivors were very satisfied with their ICU care. In contrast to HIC settings, specific ICU experiences were frequently not recalled, but those remembered were reported as relatively stress-free. Stressful experiences, in common with HIC, were most frequently related to uncertainty about the future, dependency, family, and economic concerns.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAdultCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayPatient SatisfactionPovertySri LankaStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsCritical careICU experienceLow middle income countriesStressors

Identifiers

PMID29562877
PMCPMC5863441
OpenAlexW2794513329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.