ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2018
A Guide for Using Mechanical Stimulation to Enhance Tissue-Engineered Articular Cartilage Properties.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standardized Effect Measures Informing Next-Generation Strategies for Mechanical Stimulation in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Pooled it
- Engineered Injectable Hydrogel Platform for Tailoring the Osteoarthritis Microenvironment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Cellular Responses to Mechanical Cues Across Scales: From Fundamental Insights to Translational Potential.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Effects of Compression on Extracellular Matrix Synthesis by Chondrocytes and Chondrosarcoma Cells.Cartilage · 2026Article
- Predicting Cell Differentiation in Mechanically Stimulated Biphasic Osteochondral Scaffolds Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pressure-Regulated Chondrogenesis of BMSCs: Static Negative Pressure Primes Differentiation through Apoptotic Vesicles.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Biophysical signal-driven scaffold design for stem cell-guided osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Bioreactor-Induced Compression in Scaffolds for the Enhancement of Cartilage Regeneration: A Systematic Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Tissue-Engineered Cartilage for Nasal Reconstruction: Mechanical Stimulation Through Bidirectional Bending.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Partial unicondylar arthroplasty with three-dimensional-printed porous tantalum prosthesis shows promising early results for focal osteochondral defects: a retrospective comparative study with average of 49.6-month follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Mechanobiology-based strategies for the maturation of biofabricated cartilage constructs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Nasal Cartilage Preserved in Ethanol at 4 °C versus Normal Saline at -18 °C for Rhinoplasty Reuse.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- BMSC-NFMC Model for Vascular Regulation and Interface Integration in Osteochondral Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Numerical study of the structural design influence on cartilage cell differentiation in mechanically stimulated hydrogel scaffolds using an FSI-based model.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Mechanical and Physical Characterization of a Biphasic 3D Printed Silk-Infilled Scaffold for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Compressive stress gradients direct mechanoregulation of anisotropic growth in the zebrafish jaw joint.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- GelMA-glycol chitosan hydrogels for cartilage regeneration: The role of uniaxial mechanical stimulation in enhancing mechanical, adhesive, and biochemical properties.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Simultaneous Hydrostatic and Compressive Loading System for Mimicking the Mechanical Environment of Living Cartilage Tissue.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Review
- Progress in biomechanical stimuli on the cell-encapsulated hydrogels for cartilage tissue regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of tissue-engineered articular cartilage (TEAC) constructs has the potential to become a powerful treatment option for cartilage lesions resulting from trauma or early stages of pathology. Although fundamental tissue-engineering strategies based on the use of scaffolds, cells, and signals have been developed, techniques that lead to biomimetic AC constructs that can be translated to in vivo use are yet to be fully confirmed. Mechanical stimulation during tissue culture can be an effective strategy to enhance the mechanical, structural, and cellular properties of tissue-engineered constructs toward mimicking those of native AC. This review focuses on the use of mechanical stimulation to attain and enhance the properties of AC constructs needed to translate these implants to the clinic. In vivo, mechanical loading at maximal and supramaximal physiological levels has been shown to be detrimental to AC through the development of degenerative changes. In contrast, multiple studies have revealed that during culture, mechanical stimulation within narrow ranges of magnitude and duration can produce anisotropic, mechanically robust AC constructs with high cellular viability. Significant progress has been made in evaluating a variety of mechanical stimulation techniques on TEAC, either alone or in combination with other stimuli. These advancements include determining and optimizing efficacious loading parameters (e.g., duration and frequency) to yield improvements in construct design criteria, such as collagen II content, compressive stiffness, cell viability, and fiber organization. With the advancement of mechanical stimulation as a potent strategy in AC tissue engineering, a compendium detailing the results achievable by various stimulus regimens would be of great use for researchers in academia and industry. The objective is to list the qualitative and quantitative effects that can be attained when direct compression, hydrostatic pressure, shear, and tensile loading are used to tissue-engineer AC. Our goal is to provide a practical guide to their use and optimization of loading parameters. For each loading condition, we will also present and discuss benefits and limitations of bioreactor configurations that have been used. The intent is for this review to serve as a reference for including mechanical stimulation strategies as part of AC construct culture regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.