Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29562786›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2018

The Immunomodulatory Properties of Amniotic Cells: The Two Sides of the Coin.

Marta Magatti, Elsa Vertua, Anna Cargnoni, Antonietta Silini, Ornella Parolini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Primate amnion development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell-based therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Magatti1 Centro di Ricerca "E. Menni", Fondazione Poliambulanza- Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Elsa Vertua1 Centro di Ricerca "E. Menni", Fondazione Poliambulanza- Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Anna Cargnoni1 Centro di Ricerca "E. Menni", Fondazione Poliambulanza- Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Antonietta Silini1 Centro di Ricerca "E. Menni", Fondazione Poliambulanza- Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Ornella Parolini1 Centro di Ricerca "E. Menni", Fondazione Poliambulanza- Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the many cell types useful in developing therapeutic treatments, human amniotic cells from placenta have been proposed as valid candidates. Both human amniotic epithelial and mesenchymal stromal cells, and the conditioned medium generated from their culture, exert multiple immunosuppressive activities. Indeed, they inhibit T and B cell proliferation, suppress inflammatory properties of monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and natural killer cells, while promoting induction of cells with regulatory functions such as regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. These properties have laid the foundation for their use for the treatment of inflammatory-based diseases, and encouraging results have been obtained in different preclinical disease models where exacerbated inflammation is present. Moreover, an immune-privileged status of amniotic cells has been often highlighted. However, even if long-term engraftment of amniotic cells has been reported into immunocompetent animals, only few cells survive after infusion. Furthermore, amniotic cells have been shown to be able to induce immune responses in vivo and, under specific culture conditions, they can stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro. Although immunosuppressive properties are a widely recognized characteristic of amniotic cells, immunogenic and stimulatory activities appear to be less reported, sporadic events. In order to improve therapeutic outcome, the mechanisms responsible for the suppressive versus stimulatory activity need to be carefully addressed. In this review, both the immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory activity of amniotic cells will be discussed.

Indexed as

AmnionAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansImmunizationImmunosuppression TherapyMesenchymal Stem Cellsamniotic epithelial cellsamniotic membraneamniotic mesenchymal stromal cellsimmunostimulationimmunosuppression

Identifiers

PMID29562786
PMCPMC6434482
OpenAlexW2790436657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.