SynthesisPloS one2018
Meta-analysis of gemcitabine in brief versus prolonged low-dose infusion for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glutathione S-Transferase Gene Polymorphisms are Associated with an Improved Treatment Response to Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Pooled it
- Is Monitoring of the Intracellular Active Metabolite Levels of Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogs Ready for Precision Medicine Applications?European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2022Review
- Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its amino acid ester prodrug following intravenous and oral administrations in mice.Biochemical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Phase III Non-inferiority Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Gemcitabine Compared to Standard Dose Gemcitabine With Platinum in Advanced Squamous Lung Cancer.EClinicalMedicine · 2019Article
- Prolonged low-dose infusion for gemcitabine: a systematic review.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) at 30 min standard-dose infusion (30 min-SDI) compared with prolonged low-dose infusion (P-LDI) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsElectronic databases including Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, and VIP were searched using keywords "GEM", "P-LDI", and "NSCLC". Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and 1-year survival rate (1-year SR). Secondary endpoints were grade 3/4 hematotoxicity and nausea/vomiting. In association. GRADE quality of evidence system was used to assess the results of meta-analysis.
resultsSix randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 637 patients were included and no statistical heterogeneity was found among the studies. The results showed that P-LDI was superior in ORR (RD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.16, P = 0.02), but had a similar 1-year SR (RD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.12, P = 0.18) as compared with 30 min-SDI. For grade 3/4 adverse events, there was no significant difference in anemia (RD = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.27) and nausea/vomiting (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.06, P = 0.64) between the two treatments. However, patients with P-LDI experienced less leukopenia (RD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.01, P = 0.03) and thrombocytopenia ((RD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.09 to -0.01, P = 0.006). The GRADE profile showed that the included RCTs had low quality of evidences.
conclusionP-LDI was superior in terms of ORR, experienced less grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia compared with 30 min-SDI, and could be a viable treatment option for advanced NSCLC. However, the results need to be further verified by high quality trials and large samples owing to the low quality of evidences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.