Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29561877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A nested mixture model for genomic prediction using whole-genome SNP genotypes.

Jian Zeng, Dorian Garrick, Jack Dekkers, Rohan Fernando

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an FJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian ZengInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-5220
Dorian GarrickSchool of Agriculture, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Jack DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Rohan FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.

Funding

Factors Affecting Prediction Accuracy of Complex Human Traits and DiseasesR01GM099992 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction exploits single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the whole genome for predicting genetic merit of selection candidates. In most models for genomic prediction, e.g. BayesA, B, C, R and GBLUP, independence of SNP effects is assumed. However, SNP effects are expected to be locally dependent given the presence of a nearby QTL because SNPs surrounding the QTL do not segregate independently. A consequence of ignoring this dependence is that SNPs with small effects may be overly shrunk, e.g. effects from markers with high minor allele frequencies (MAF) that flank QTL with low MAF. A nested mixture model (BayesN) is developed to account for the dependence of effects of SNPs that are closely linked, where the effects of SNPs in every non-overlapping genomic window a priori follow a point mass at zero for all SNPs or a mixture of some SNPs with nonzero effects and others with zero effects. It can be regarded as a parsimonious alternative to the existing antedependence model, antiBayesB, which allow a nonstationary dependence of SNP effects. Illumina 777K BovineHD genotypes from 948 Angus cattle were used to simulate 5,000 offspring, with 4,000 used for training and 1,000 for validation. Scenarios with 300 common (MAF > 0.05) or rare (MAF < 0.05) QTL randomly selected from segregating SNPs were replicated 8 times. SNPs corresponding to QTL were masked from a 600k panel comprising SNPs with MAF > 0.05 or a 50k evenly spaced subset of these. Compared with BayesB and a modified antiBayesB, BayesN improved the accuracy of prediction up to 2.0% with 50k SNPs and up to 7.0% with 600k SNPs, most improvements occurring in the rare QTL scenario. Computing time was reduced up to 60% with 50k SNPs and up to 75% with 600k SNPs. BayesN is an accurate and computationally efficient method for genomic prediction with whole-genome SNPs, especially for traits with rare QTL.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBreedingCattleGene FrequencyGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29561877
PMCPMC5862491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.