ArticlePloS one2018
Evaluation of milk sample fractions for characterization of milk microbiota from healthy and clinical mastitis cows.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age Influences the Bacterial Composition of Samples From Buffaloes in the Marajó Archipelago, Pará, Brazilian Amazon.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Antifungal susceptibility and genomic profile associated with biosynthetic gene clusters of bovine mastitis-derivedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Health Problems with Mycotoxins in Cattle-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Microbial Composition of Bovine Colostrum as Influenced by Antibiotic Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic resistance in mastitis-causing bacteria: Exploring antibiotic-resistance genes, underlying mechanisms, and their implications for dairy animal and public health.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Optimization ofJournal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Can qPCR on pooled sheep milk detect brucellosis as part of herd brucellosis control and eradication programs?BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Microbial dynamics in the ripening process of Vorarlberger Alpkäse: farm-specific variations at two Austrian alpine farms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Milk microbiota of Holstein Friesian cattle reared in Lahore: Association with mastitis.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- Bovine milk microbiota: Key players, origins, and potential contributions to early-life gut development.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- Basic concepts, recent advances, and future perspectives in the diagnosis of bovine mastitis.Journal of veterinary science · 2024Review
- Investigation of milk microbiota of healthy and mastitic Sahiwal cattle.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Similarity in milk microbiota in replicates.MicrobiologyOpen · 2023Article
- Attenuation of Immunogenicity in MOG-Induced Oligodendrocytes by the Probiotic BacteriumMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Accuracy of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of bovine brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Effect of Intramammary Dry Cow Antimicrobial Treatment on Fresh Cow's Milk Microbiota in California Commercial Dairies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Induction of mastitis by cow-to-mouse fecal and milk microbiota transplantation causes microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbation in mice.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
- Bovine milk microbiota: Evaluation of different DNA extraction protocols for challenging samples.MicrobiologyOpen · 2022Article
- The Influence of Bacteria Causing Subclinical Mastitis on the Structure of the Cow's Milk Microbiome.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Expressions of IL4, IL10, and IFNγ cytokines genes during bacterial mastitis.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amplicon sequencing technique has been increasingly applied to the clinical setting as a sensitive diagnostic tool. Therefore, it is of great importance to develop a DNA extraction method that accurate isolates DNA from complex host-associated microbiota. Given the multifactorial etiology of clinical mastitis and the diversified lifestyle of bacterial species harboring in milk, here four distinct milk sample fractions: raw whole milk, milk fat, casein-pellet, and casein-pellet + fat from healthy cows and cows with clinical mastitis, were subjected to bead-beating DNA extraction, followed by high-throughput sequencing. We aimed to identify the best approach for characterization of the milk microbiota and detection of mastitis pathogens (Klebsiella spp., Streptococcus spp. and Escherichia coli). DNA from each milk fraction tested was extracted by two commercial kits, which include physical, mechanical and chemical lysis; in total 280 DNA samples from 35 cows were analyzed. Milk-health-status were categorized into four groups (healthy group; E. coli-mastitis group; Klebsiella spp.-mastitis group; and Streptococcus spp.-mastitis group). Bacterial phyla and families were described for each milk-health-status group across milk sample fractions and DNA extraction kits. For the mastitis groups the relative abundance of f__Enterobacteriaceae and f__Streptococcaceae were compared to determine the efficacy of procedures in detecting the mastitis pathogens. The four milk fractions used allowed efficiently and uniformly detection of the causative agent of mastitis. Only 27% of the families detected in healthy milk were shared among the samples extracted from all fractions of milk samples; followed by 3, 4, and 12% for the samples from E. coli-mastitis, Klebsiella spp.-mastitis and Streptococcus spp-mastitis, respectively. However, the shared families comprised a mean relative abundance greater than 85%, regardless of milk-health-status, milk fraction and DNA isolation method. Taxonomic data at the family level showed that sequences from mastitis milk samples cultured positive for E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were predominantly affiliated with f__Enterobacteriaceae, while for Streptococcus spp. were dominated by f__Streptococcacea, followed by f__Pseudomonadaceae and f__Enterococcaceae. Microbial community analysis revealed that most of the microbial community composition corresponded to milk bacterial species irrespective of the DNA isolation method and milk fraction evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.