SynthesisMedicine2018
The role of real-time elastography-targeted biopsy in the detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the potential of strain elastography in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma biopsies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence System for Predicting Prostate Cancer Lesions from Shear Wave Elastography Measurements.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.Cancers · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting prostate cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen grey zone based on retrospective analysis of clinical and multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-derived data.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Role of Transrectal Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Carcinoma.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of real-time elastography (RTE)-targeted biopsy in the detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial.
methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 31, 2017 and used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess the quality of the identified studies. We applied the relative sensitivity value to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RTE-targeted biopsy using the 10-core systematic biopsy as the reference standard.
resultsSeven studies comprising 5 cohorts and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Of the 5 cohorts that encompassed 698 participants, we found that RTE-targeted biopsy did not outperform systematic biopsy in either overall PCa detection (69.5% vs 80.5%, relative sensitivity 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06) or for the initial biopsy (56.8% vs 64.0%, relative sensitivity 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.11). For the core-by-core analysis, more positive cores were detected by RTE-targeted biopsy than systematic biopsy (21% vs 11%, relative sensitivity 2.17, 95% CI 1.61-2.95). The 2 RCTs showed a favorable trend toward greater PCa detection when a combination of systematic biopsies and RTE-targeted biopsies was used than when systematic biopsy alone was used (45.5% vs 39.5%, risk ratio (RR) 1.18, 95% CI 0.98-1.43).
conclusionCurrently, there is not enough evidence to demonstrate that RTE-targeted biopsy can outperform systematic biopsy, but the combination of systematic and RTE-targeted biopsy may be a promising approach for improving PCa detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.