Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29561341›Full record

ArticleAdvances in skin & wound care2018

The Management of Critically Colonized and Locally Infected Leg Ulcers with an Acid-Oxidizing Solution: A Pilot Study.

Robert Strohal, Martina Mittlböck, Gilbert Hämmerle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in skin & wound care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbiological Status of Venous Leg Ulcers and Its Predictors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert StrohalRobert Strohal, MD, is Professor and Department Head, Department of Dermatology, Federal Academic Teaching Hospital of Feldkirch, Austria; Martina Mittlböck, PhD, MSc, is Professor of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; and Gilbert Hämmerle is Wound Manager, Central Ambulance of Wound Care, Department of Nursing, Federal County Hospital of Bregenz, Austria.
Martina Mittlböck
Gilbert Hämmerle
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCritical colonization or local infection is very common in chronic wounds, but clinically problematic. Because therapeutic options for these conditions are limited in number and efficacy, the study authors tested a new acid-oxidizing solution (AOS [Nexodyn]; APR Applied Pharma Research S.A., Balerna, Switzerland) to determine its ancillary antimicrobial properties and potential support for wound healing. DESIGN AND

settingThis open-label clinical case series was conducted with a prospective, single-arm design at the Federal County Hospital in Bregenz, Austria. PATIENTS: In the study, 30 patients with critically colonized or locally infected chronic leg ulcers of any origin were included.

interventionsThe AOS was applied on each leg ulcer at every dressing change for 35 days.

main outcome measuresThe tolerability and performance of the AOS were assessed by evaluating the ulcer characteristics and comparing them with those at baseline. The clinical course of wounds was analyzed using standard measures for bioburden, local infection, pain, pH, and wound healing. MAIN

resultsApplication of the solution was well tolerated, and no adverse events were recorded. In all patients, local infection was overcome, and wound bed pH and wound area decreased significantly. In addition, patient pain levels decreased to a level where interventions were not required after study day 7. In 37% of all patients, a complete resolution of chronic ulcers was achieved by the end of the study period.

conclusionAccording to these results, the AOS seems to be a valid and highly tolerable treatment to support wound healing in locally infected ulcers. Nevertheless, larger controlled cohort studies are needed to substantiate these findings.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAdministration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCritical IllnessDiabetic FootDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleFoot UlcerHumansLeg UlcerMalePharmaceutical SolutionsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPharmaceutical Solutions

Identifiers

PMID29561341
PMCPMC5895123
OpenAlexW2791482944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.