Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29560624›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2018

Polymeric endovascular strut and lumen detection algorithm for intracoronary optical coherence tomography images.

Junedh M Amrute, Lambros S Athanasiou, Farhad Rikhtegar, José M de la Torre Hernández, Tamara García Camarero, Elazer R Edelman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Position Paper Computational Cardiology.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Junedh M AmruteCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Pasadena, Califo, United States.
Lambros S AthanasiouMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Cambridge, Ma, United States.
Farhad RikhtegarMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Cambridge, Ma, United States.
José M de la Torre HernándezHospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Servicio de Ca, Spain.
Tamara García CamareroHospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Unidad de Cardiologia Intervencionista, Servicio de Ca, Spain.
Elazer R EdelmanMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Cambridge, Ma, United States.
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymeric endovascular implants are the next step in minimally invasive vascular interventions. As an alternative to traditional metallic drug-eluting stents, these often-erodible scaffolds present opportunities and challenges for patients and clinicians. Theoretically, as they resorb and are absorbed over time, they obviate the long-term complications of permanent implants, but in the short-term visualization and therefore positioning is problematic. Polymeric scaffolds can only be fully imaged using optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging-they are relatively invisible via angiography-and segmentation of polymeric struts in OCT images is performed manually, a laborious and intractable procedure for large datasets. Traditional lumen detection methods using implant struts as boundary limits fail in images with polymeric implants. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated method to detect polymeric struts and luminal borders in OCT images; we present such a fully automated algorithm. Accuracy was validated using expert annotations on 1140 OCT images with a positive predictive value of 0.93 for strut detection and an R2 correlation coefficient of 0.94 between detected and expert-annotated lumen areas. The proposed algorithm allows for rapid, accurate, and automated detection of polymeric struts and the luminal border in OCT images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCoronary VesselsEndovascular ProceduresHumansPolymersProsthesis DesignTomography, Optical CoherencePolymersbioresorbable vascular scaffoldlumenoptical coherence tomographypolymeric scaffoldsstrut

Identifiers

PMID29560624
PMCPMC5859384
OpenAlexW2790463259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.