ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2018
Prognostic Factors for Functional and Anatomic Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Dexamethasone Implant.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular oedema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the AUSSIEDEX study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Predictive factors for treatment outcomes with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema in clinical practice.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Article
- The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Diabetic Macular Edema Screened by Handheld Smartphone-based Retinal Camera and Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical systems · 2021Article
- Intravitreal ranibizumab and dexamethasone implant injections as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema: simultaneously double protocol.Eye (London, England) · 2021Article
- Challenges in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: An Expert Consensus Report.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: a retrospective study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Restoration of Foveal Bulge after Resolution of Diabetic Macular Edema with Coexisting Serous Retinal Detachment.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Article
- Article
- Dexamethasone implant in the management of diabetic macular edema from clinician's perspective.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the prognostic factors of visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 32 eyes of 31 patients with DME for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness, and height and width of both intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine correlations between the baseline characteristics and outcomes at 3 and 6 months.
resultsBaseline predictor of BCVA ≥20 / 40 at month 3 was short height of baseline IRF (p = 0.02), while good baseline BCVA was a predictor for month 6 (p = 0.01). Predictors of improvement in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution BCVA 0.2 at month 3 were the absence of baseline IRF and poor baseline BCVA (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively), while poor baseline BCVA was the sole predictor at month 6 (p = 0.01). Predictor of central macular thickness ≤300 μm at month 3 was younger age (p = 0.03), while the absence of IRF was the predictor for BCVA improvement at month 6 (p = 0.02). BCVA ≤20 / 100 at month 3 was predicted by poor baseline BCVA (p = 0.01), and increased width of total IRF was the predictor at month 6 (p = 0.02). Predictor of loss of logarithm of minimum angle of resolution BCVA 0.2 at month 6 was increased width of total IRF at baseline (p = 0.04). Additional injection within 6 months was negatively associated with the presence of baseline DME (p = 0.03).
conclusionsThe visual and anatomical outcome of DME treatment with dexamethasone implant can be predicted by baseline visual acuity and IRF morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.