Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29560570›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2018

Young Women's Ratings of Three Placebo Multipurpose Prevention Technologies for HIV and Pregnancy Prevention in a Randomized, Cross-Over Study in Kenya and South Africa.

Alexandra M Minnis, Sarah T Roberts, Kawango Agot, Rachel Weinrib, Khatija Ahmed, Kgahlisho Manenzhe, Fredrick Owino, Ariane van der Straten, TRIO Study Team

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra M MinnisWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA. aminnis@rti.org.
Sarah T RobertsWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Kawango AgotImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Rachel WeinribWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Kgahlisho ManenzheSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Fredrick OwinoImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Ariane van der StratenWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 351 California Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
TRIO Study Team
RTI International · USImpact Research and Development Organization · KESetshaba Research Centre · ZAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (US) OPP1114942NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-user input is critical to inform development of multipurpose prevention technology (MPT) products that prevent HIV and pregnancy. The TRIO Study, conducted in Kenya and South Africa, enrolled 277 HIV-negative women aged 18-30 in a randomized cross-over study to use each placebo MPT (daily oral tablets, monthly injections, and monthly vaginal ring) for one month. At the end of each month, participants rated how much they liked using the product on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = liked very much). We compared mean ratings using paired t-tests and examined sociodemographic-, attribute-, and behavior-related characteristics associated with ratings using multivariable linear regression and data from in-depth interviews. After use, mean ratings were significantly higher for injections [4.3 (SD = 1.0)] compared with tablets [3.0 (SD = 1.3)] and rings [3.3 (SD = 1.4)] (p < 0.001); mean ratings for rings were significantly higher than for tablets (p = 0.013). Mean ratings of a hypothetical active MPT increased for all products after the one-month period of use, with the greatest increase for rings, the least familiar product. In multivariable analysis, acceptability of key product attributes (e.g., product look) were associated with a significant increase of ≥ 1 point in the mean rating across all three products (p ≤ 0.001). Perceived ability to use the product without partner knowledge was associated with a higher mean rating for rings (b = 0.50; p = 0.006). The acceptability of product attributes contributed significantly to the rating of all products, highlighting the value of choice in pregnancy and HIV prevention to accommodate diverse users.

Indexed as

Administration, OralContraceptive Devices, FemaleInjectionsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraceptive AgentsCross-Over StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaLinear ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionContraceptive AgentsPlacebosAcceptabilityContraceptionEnd-user researchHIV preventionMulti-purpose prevention technologiesUse ratings

Identifiers

PMID29560570
PMCPMC6097726
OpenAlexW2794415141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.