Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29560568›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Continuous Deep Sedation Until Death-a Swiss Death Certificate Study.

Sarah Ziegler, Margareta Schmid, Matthias Bopp, Georg Bosshard, Milo Alan Puhan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in the Hospital.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between continuous deep sedation and survival time in terminally ill cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah ZieglerEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. sarah.ziegler@uzh.ch.
Margareta SchmidEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias BoppEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Georg BosshardClinic for Geriatric Medicine, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Milo Alan PuhanEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last decade, the number of patients continuously deeply sedated until death increased up to fourfold. The reasons for this increase remain unclear.

objectiveTo identify socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of sedated patients, and concurrent possibly life-shortening medical end-of-life decisions.

designCross-sectional death certificate study in German-speaking Switzerland in 2001 and 2013.

participantsNon-sudden and expected deaths (2001: N = 2281, 2013: N = 2256) based on a random sample of death certificates and followed by an anonymous survey on end-of-life practices among attending physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Physicians' reported proportion of patients continuously deeply sedated until death, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and possibly life-shortening medical end-of life decisions. KEY

resultsIn 2013, physicians sedated four times more patients continuously until death (6.7% in 2001; 24.5.5% in 2013). Four out of five sedated patients died in hospitals, outside specialized palliative care units, or in nursing homes. Sedation was more likely among patients younger than 65 (odds ratio 2.24, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2) and those dying in specialized palliative care (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.8) or in hospitals (1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3). Forgoing life-prolonging treatment with the explicit intention to hasten or not to postpone death combined with intensified alleviation of symptoms was very strongly associated with continuous deep sedation (OR 6.8, 95% CI 4.7 to 9.8).

conclusionsIn Swiss clinical practice, continuously deeply sedated patients predominantly died outside specialized palliative care. The increasing trend over time appears to be related to changes in medical end-of-life practice rather than to patient's clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

Death CertificatesPhysician's RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDeep SedationFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle Ageddeep sedationgeneral internal medicineprimary caresymptom alleviationwithholding treatment

Identifiers

PMID29560568
PMCPMC6025678
OpenAlexW2790739136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.