ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2018
Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-specific associations between holistic processing and individual differences in face memory.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Article
- Persistent task-specific impairment of holistic face processing in acquired prosopagnosia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Understanding Navon: A detailed structural and conceptual analysis of a basic local-global task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Binocular rivalry reveals differential face processing in congenital prosopagnosia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Autism Traits and Cognitive Performance: Mediating Roles of Sleep Disturbance, Anxiety and Depression.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023Article
- Holistic and featural processing's link to face recognition varies by individual and task.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Seeing the forest or the tree depends on personality: Evidence from process communication model during global/local visual search task.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Link between fluid/crystallized intelligence and global/local visual abilities across adulthood.Consciousness and cognition · 2022Article
- Progressive attenuation of visual global precedence across healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- When cognitive control harms rather than helps: individuals with high working memory capacity are less efficient at infrequent contraction of attentional breadth.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Forest Before Trees: Letter Stimulus and Sex Modulate Global Precedence in Visual Perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- How the forest interacts with the trees: Multiscale shape integration explains global and local processing.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- The Influence of Inhibition of Return and Level-Priming on the Global Precedence Effect.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been an increase in studies adopting an individual difference approach to examine visual cognition and in particular in studies trying to relate face recognition performance with measures of holistic processing (the face composite effect and the part-whole effect). In the present study we examine whether global precedence effects, measured by means of non-face stimuli in Navon's paradigm, can also account for individual differences in face recognition and, if so, whether the effect is of similar magnitude for faces and objects. We find evidence that global precedence effects facilitate both face and object recognition, and to a similar extent. Our results suggest that both face and object recognition are characterized by a coarse-to-fine temporal dynamic, where global shape information is derived prior to local shape information, and that the efficiency of face and object recognition is related to the magnitude of the global precedence effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29560562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.