ReviewMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2017
Prevalence of
Review in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Stress and other risk factors in central serous chorioretinopathy-A myth?]Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Correlation between diabetic retinopathy andInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Comments to the Editor concerning the paper entitled "The microbiome and ophthalmic disease" by Baim et al.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Genome-wide association analyses identify two susceptibility loci for pachychoroid disease central serous chorioretinopathy.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Eye reflux: an ocular extraesophageal manifestation of gastric reflux.International journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29560365PMC5847306W2976066164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.