Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29560261›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Recent advances in understanding how rod-like bacteria stably maintain their cell shapes.

Sven van Teeffelen, Lars D Renner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Establishing rod shape from spherical, peptidoglycan-deficient bacterial spores.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven van TeeffelenDepartment of Microbiology, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Lars D RennerLeibniz Institute of Polymer Research and the Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Institut Pasteur · FRLeibniz Institute of Polymer Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell shape and cell volume are important for many bacterial functions. In recent years, we have seen a range of experimental and theoretical work that led to a better understanding of the determinants of cell shape and size. The roles of different molecular machineries for cell-wall expansion have been detailed and partially redefined, mechanical forces have been shown to influence cell shape, and new connections between metabolism and cell shape have been proposed. Yet the fundamental determinants of the different cellular dimensions remain to be identified. Here, we highlight some of the recent developments and focus on the determinants of rod-like cell shape and size in the well-studied model organisms

Indexed as

bacterial functionsbacterial metabolismbacterial physiologyB.subtiliscell shapecell sizeE.colirod-like

Identifiers

PMID29560261
PMCPMC5832919
OpenAlexW2790000578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.