ArticleElectronic physician2017
A fuzzy rule-based expert system for diagnosing cystic fibrosis.
Article in Electronic physician, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Supplementation in Anemic Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: Effects on Hematologic, Clinical, and Pulmonary Outcomes.Tanaffos · 2025Article
- Interleukin-1 and Interleukin-8 are Prominent Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and Non-Cystic Fibrosis.Tanaffos · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Anemia and its Relation with Shwachman Score in Children with Cystic Fibrosis.Tanaffos · 2023Article
- Assessing the effect of arrival time of physician and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) team on the outcome of CPR.Interventional medicine & applied science · 2020Article
- Diagnosis support systems for rare diseases: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- A Fuzzy Expert System to Predict the Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: a Focused Literature Survey.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFinding a valid diagnosis is mostly a prolonged process. Current advances in the sector of artificial intelligence have led to the appearance of expert systems that enrich the experiences and capabilities of doctors for making decisions for their patients.
objectiveThe objective of this research was developing a fuzzy expert system for diagnosing Cystic Fibrosis (CF).
methodsDefining the risk factors and then, designing the fuzzy expert system for diagnosis of CF were carried out in this cross-sectional study. To evaluate the performance of the proposed system, a dataset that corresponded to 70 patients with respiratory disease who were serially admitted to the CF Clinic in the Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Center, Masih Daneshvari Hospital in Tehran, Iran during August 2016 to January 2017 was considered. Whole procedures of system construction were implemented in a MATLAB environment.
resultsResults showed that the suggested system can be used as a strong diagnostic tool with 93.02% precision, 89.29% specificity, 95.24% sensitivity and 92.86% accuracy for diagnosing CF. There was also a good relationship between the user and the system through the appealing user interface.
conclusionThe system is equipped with information, knowledge, and expertise from certified specialists; hence, as a training tool it can be useful for new physicians. It is worth mentioning that the accomplishment of this project depends on advocacy of decision making in CF diagnosis. Nevertheless, it is expected that the system will reduce the number of false positives and false negatives in unusual cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.