Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29559965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

The Intestinal Mycobiota in Wild Zebrafish Comprises Mainly Dothideomycetes While Saccharomycetes Predominate in Their Laboratory-Reared Counterparts.

Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder, Viswanath Kiron, Jep Lokesh, Moger Rajeish, Martina Kopp, Jorge Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Seasonal Variations in the Gut Fungal Communities of Hooded Crane (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prabhugouda SiriyappagouderFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Viswanath KironFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Jep LokeshFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Moger RajeishCollege of Fisheries, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Mangalore, India.
Martina KoppFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Jorge FernandesFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an integral part of the resident microbial community of fish intestinal tract, the mycobiota is expected to play important roles in health and disease resistance of the host. The composition of the diverse fungal communities, which colonize the intestine, is greatly influenced by the host, their diet and geographic origin. Studies of fungal communities are rare and the majority of previous studies have relied on culture-based methods. In particular, fungal communities in fish are also poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth overview of the intestinal mycobiota in a model fish species (zebrafish,

Indexed as

fungal diversityIllumina MiSeqinternal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)mycobiotayeastzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29559965
PMCPMC5845672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.