Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29559742›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Michael S Toss, I Miligy, Abdubaqi Al-Kawaz, Mansour Alsleem, Hazem Khout, Padmashree C Rida, Ritu Aneja, Andrew R Green, Ian O Ellis, Emad A Rakha

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Microenvironment in DCIS and Its Role in Disease Progression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Multi-omics portrait of ductal carcinoma in situ in young women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael S TossAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-3984
I MiligyAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abdubaqi Al-KawazAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Mansour AlsleemAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Hazem KhoutAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Padmashree C RidaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ritu AnejaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew R GreenAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian O EllisAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Emad A RakhaAcademic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. emad.rakha@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBGeorgia State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) provide prognostic value in invasive breast cancer and guidelines for their assessment have been published. This study aims to evaluate: (a) methods of TILs assessment, and (b) their prognostic significance in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Hematoxylin and eosin sections from two clinically annotated DCIS cohorts; a training set (n = 150 pure DCIS) and a validation set (n = 666 comprising 534 pure DCIS and 132 cases wherein DCIS and invasive breast carcinoma were co-existent) were assessed. Seven different scoring methods were applied to the training set to identify the most optimal reproducible method associated with strongest prognostic value. Among different methods, TILs touching ducts' basement membrane or away from it by one lymphocyte cell thickness provided the strongest significant association with outcome and highest concordance rate [inter-cluster correlation coefficient = 0.95]. Assessment of periductal TILs at increasing distances from DCIS (0.2 , 0.5 , and 1 mm) as well as percent of stromal TILs were practically challenging and showed lower concordance rates than touching TILs. TILs hotspots and lymphoid follicles did not show prognostic significance. Within the pure DCIS validation set, dense TILs were associated with younger age, symptomatic presentation, larger size, higher nuclear grade, comedo necrosis and estrogen receptor negativity as well as shorter recurrence-free interval (p = 0.002). In multivariate survival analysis, dense TILs were independent predictor of shorter recurrence-free interval (p = 0.002) in patients treated with breast conservation. DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma showed denser TILs than pure DCIS (p = 9.0 × 10

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29559742
OpenAlexW2794735544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.