Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29559218›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2019

Understanding older adults' medication decision making and behavior: A study on over-the-counter (OTC) anticholinergic medications.

Richard J Holden, Preethi Srinivas, Noll L Campbell, Daniel O Clark, Kunal S Bodke, Youngbok Hong, Malaz A Boustani, Denisha Ferguson, Christopher M Callahan, IU Brain Health Patient Safety Laboratory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The methodology of the Agile Nudge University.Frontiers in health services · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard J HoldenDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: rjholden@iupui.edu.
Preethi SrinivasIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Noll L CampbellIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Purdue University College of Pharmacy - Lafayette, IN, USA.
Daniel O ClarkIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kunal S BodkeIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Youngbok HongIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Herron School of Art and Design - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Malaz A BoustaniIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana CTSI - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Denisha FergusonIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christopher M CallahanIndiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR), Regenstrief Institute, Inc. - Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University School of Medicine - Indianapolis, IN, USA.
IU Brain Health Patient Safety Laboratory

Funding

Brain Health Patient Safety Learning LaboratoryP30HS024384 · AHRQ · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024384NIH HHS P30 HS024384-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults purchase and use over-the-counter (OTC) medications with potentially significant adverse effects. Some OTC medications, such as those with anticholinergic effects, are relatively contraindicated for use by older adults due to evidence of impaired cognition and other adverse effects.

objectiveTo inform the design of future OTC medication safety interventions for older adults, this study investigated consumers' decision making and behavior related to OTC medication purchasing and use, with a focus on OTC anticholinergic medications.

methodsThe study had a cross-sectional design with multiple methods. A total of 84 adults participated in qualitative research interviews (n = 24), in-store shopper observations (n = 39), and laboratory-based simulated OTC shopping tasks (n = 21). Simulated shopping participants also rank-ordered eight factors on their importance for OTC decision making.

resultsFindings revealed that many participants had concerns about medication adverse effects, generally, but were not aware of age-related risk associated with the use of anticholinergic medications. Analyses produced a map of the workflow of OTC-related behavior and decision making as well as related barriers such as difficulty locating medications or comparing them to an alternative. Participants reported effectiveness, adverse effects or health risks, and price as most important to their OTC medication purchase and use decisions. A persona analysis identified two types of consumers: the habit follower, who frequently purchased OTC medications and considered them safe; and the deliberator, who was more likely to weigh their options and consider alternatives to OTC medications.

conclusionA conceptual model of OTC medication purchase and use is presented. Drawing on study findings and behavioral theories, the model depicts dual processes for OTC medication decision making - habit-based and deliberation-based - as well as the antecedents and consequences of decision making. This model suggests several design directions for consumer-oriented interventions to promote OTC medication safety.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDecision MakingHealth BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overCholinergic AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleNonprescription DrugsCholinergic AntagonistsNonprescription DrugsAnticholinergic medicationsDecision makingElderlyMixed methodsOver-the-counter medicationUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID29559218
PMCPMC6690198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.