Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29559004›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2018

Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid tau, neurofilament, and progranulin in definite frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Joery Goossens, Maria Bjerke, Sara Van Mossevelde, Tobi Van den Bossche, Johan Goeman, Bart De Vil, Anne Sieben, Jean-Jacques Martin, Patrick Cras, Peter Paul De Deyn and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Diagnostic Role of FDG-PET in Dementias Presenting with Language and Behavioral Symptom.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  7. Frontotemporal Dementia, Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joery GoossensReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia, Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behavior, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Maria BjerkeReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia, Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behavior, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sara Van MosseveldeInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tobi Van den BosscheInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Johan GoemanDepartment of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, 2660, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Bart De VilInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Anne SiebenInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Jean-Jacques MartinInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Patrick CrasInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Peter Paul De DeynReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia, Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behavior, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Christine Van BroeckhovenInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Julie van der ZeeInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sebastiaan EngelborghsReference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia, Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behavior, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. sebastiaan.engelborghs@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-9785
University of Antwerp · BEZNA Middelheim Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe explored the diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in allowing differentiation between frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as between FTLD pathological subtypes.

methodsCSF levels of routine AD biomarkers (phosphorylated tau (p-tau

resultsGRN mutation carriers had significantly lower progranulin levels compared to other FTLD patients, AD, and controls. Both t-tau and p-tau

conclusionsThere is an added value for Nf-L in the differential diagnosis of FTLD. Progranulin levels in CSF depend on mutation status, and GRN mutation carriers seem to be affected by more severe neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleFrontotemporal Lobar DegenerationHumansIntermediate FilamentsMaleMental Status ScheduleMiddle AgedProgranulinstau ProteinsProgranulinstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersCerebrospinal fluidDifferential diagnosisFrontotemporal lobar degenerationNeurofilamentProgranulinTau

Identifiers

PMID29559004
PMCPMC5859717
OpenAlexW2802518465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.