Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558927›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2018

The effects of housing stability on service use among homeless adults with mental illness in a randomized controlled trial of housing first.

Nick Kerman, John Sylvestre, Tim Aubry, Jino Distasio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03622151 (Homeless Population and Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03622151 nacompletednot on this map

Homeless Population and Mental Health: Impact of Primer la Llar Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorParc Sanitari Sant Joan de DéuRan2016 to 2018Enrolled86ConditionsMental Health DisorderArmsPrimer la Llar program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Investigating the Role of Situational Disruptors in Engagement with Digital Mental Health Tools.CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Change in Housing Status among Homeless and Formerly Homeless Individuals in Quebec, Canada: A Profile Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Neighbourhood-level marginalization and avoidable mortality in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  20. Predictors of Emergency Department Use among Individuals with Current or Previous Experience of Homelessness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nick KermanSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. nkerm094@uottawa.ca.
John SylvestreSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Tim AubrySchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Jino DistasioDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousing First is an effective intervention to stably house and alter service use patterns in a large proportion of homeless people with mental illness. However, it is unknown whether there are differences in the patterns of service use over time among those who do or do not become stably housed and what effect, if any, Housing First has on these differing service use patterns. This study explored changes in the service use of people with mental illness who received Housing First compared to standard care, and how patterns of use differed among people who did and did not become stably housed.

methodsThe study design was a multi-site randomized controlled trial of Housing First, a supported housing intervention. 2039 participants (Housing First: n = 1131; standard care: n = 908) were included in this study. Outcome variables include nine types of self-reported service use over 24 months. Linear mixed models examined what effects the intervention and housing stability had on service use.

resultsParticipants who achieved housing stability, across the two groups, had decreased use of inpatient psychiatric hospitals and increased use of food banks. Within the Housing First group, unstably housed participants spent more time in prison over the study period. The Housing First and standard care groups both had decreased use of emergency departments and homeless shelters.

conclusionsThe temporal service use changes that occurred as homeless people with mental illness became stably housed are similar for those receiving Housing First or standard care, with the exception of time in prison. Service use patterns, particularly with regard to psychiatric hospitalizations and time in prison, may signify persons who are at-risk of recurrent homelessness. Housing support teams should be alert to the impacts of stay-based services, such as hospitalizations and incarcerations, on housing stability and offer an increased level of support to tenants during critical periods, such as discharges.

trial registrationISRCTN. ISRCTN42520374 . Registered 18 August 2009.

Indexed as

AdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PsychiatricHousingHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPrisonsHomelessnessHousing firstMental disordersService use

Identifiers

PMID29558927
PMCPMC5859427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.