Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558923›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake.

Lauren Rockliffe, Amanda J Chorley, Emily McBride, Jo Waller, Alice S Forster

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren RockliffeResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-8690
Amanda J ChorleyResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Emily McBrideResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Jo WallerResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Alice S ForsterResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. alice.forster@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17219Cancer Research UK 17429Cancer Research UK C49896/A17429Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qualitatively assessed the acceptability of increasing uptake of HPV vaccination by incentivising consent form return.

methodsIn the context of a two-arm, cluster randomised feasibility trial, qualitative free-text questionnaire responses were collected from adolescent girls (n = 181) and their parents (n = 61), assessing the acceptability of an incentive intervention to increase HPV vaccination consent form return. In the incentive intervention arm, girls who returned a signed consent form (regardless of whether consent was given or refused), had a 1-in-10 chance of winning a £50 shopping voucher. Telephone interviews were also conducted with members of staff from participating schools (n = 6), assessing the acceptability of the incentive. Data were analysed thematically.

resultsGirls and parents provided a mix of positive, negative and ambivalent responses about the use of the incentive to encourage HPV vaccination consent form return. Both girls and parents held misconceptions about the nature of the incentive, wrongly believing that the incentive was dependent on vaccination receipt rather than consent form return. School staff members also expressed a mix of opinions on the acceptability of the incentive, including perceptions of effectiveness and ethics.

conclusionsThe use of an incentive intervention to encourage the return of HPV vaccination consent forms was found to be moderately acceptable to those receiving and delivering the intervention, although a number of changes are required to improve this. In particular, improving communication about the nature of the incentive to reduce misconceptions is vital. These findings suggest that incentivising consent form return may be an acceptable means of improving HPV vaccination rates, should improvements be made.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry; ISRCTN72136061 , 26 September 2016, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Consent FormsMotivationRewardAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentMotivationPapillomavirus vaccinesPreventionRewardVaccination

Identifiers

PMID29558923
PMCPMC5859432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.