Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558893›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

A highly adaptive microbiome-based association test for survival traits.

Hyunwook Koh, Alexandra E Livanos, Martin J Blaser, Huilin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Quantifying Metagenomic Strain Associations from Microbiomes with Anpan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Microbiome in Lung Cancer Tissue and Recurrence-Free Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyunwook KohDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, Room 547, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Alexandra E LivanosDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Martin J BlaserDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Huilin LiDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, Room 547, New York, NY, 10016, USA. huilin.li@nyumc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8288-7068

Funding

Disappearing gastrointestinal microbiota in epidemic obesity.R01DK090989 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BLASER, MARTIN J · 2010 to 2015
$7.4M
Novel Statistical Methods in Analyzing Microbiome Data for Longitudinal StudyR01DK110014 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LI, HUILIN · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090989NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK090989NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110014NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK110014NIDDK NIH HHS U01 AI22285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been increasing interest in discovering microbial taxa that are associated with human health or disease, gathering momentum through the advances in next-generation sequencing technologies. Investigators have also increasingly employed prospective study designs to survey survival (i.e., time-to-event) outcomes, but current item-by-item statistical methods have limitations due to the unknown true association pattern. Here, we propose a new adaptive microbiome-based association test for survival outcomes, namely, optimal microbiome-based survival analysis (OMiSA). OMiSA approximates to the most powerful association test in two domains: 1) microbiome-based survival analysis using linear and non-linear bases of OTUs (MiSALN) which weighs rare, mid-abundant, and abundant OTUs, respectively, and 2) microbiome regression-based kernel association test for survival traits (MiRKAT-S) which incorporates different distance metrics (e.g., unique fraction (UniFrac) distance and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity), respectively.

resultsWe illustrate that OMiSA powerfully discovers microbial taxa whether their underlying associated lineages are rare or abundant and phylogenetically related or not. OMiSA is a semi-parametric method based on a variance-component score test and a re-sampling method; hence, it is free from any distributional assumption on the effect of microbial composition and advantageous to robustly control type I error rates. Our extensive simulations demonstrate the highly robust performance of OMiSA. We also present the use of OMiSA with real data applications.

conclusionsOMiSA is attractive in practice as the true association pattern is unpredictable in advance and, for survival outcomes, no adaptive microbiome-based association test is currently available.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenetic MarkersAnimalsComputational BiologyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMicrobiotaPhenotypePhylogenyProspective StudiesSurvival RateGenetic MarkersCommunity-level association testHigh-dimensional compositional data analysisMicrobial group analysisMicrobiome-based association testMicrobiome-based survival analysisPhylogenetic tree

Identifiers

PMID29558893
PMCPMC5859547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.