Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558484›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Large-scale impacts of sea star wasting disease (SSWD) on intertidal sea stars and implications for recovery.

C Melissa Miner, Jennifer L Burnaford, Richard F Ambrose, Liam Antrim, Heath Bohlmann, Carol A Blanchette, John M Engle, Steven C Fradkin, Rani Gaddam, Christopher D G Harley and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Marine heatwave and keystone predator loss drive broad-scale decline and hinder recovery of a rocky intertidal kelp.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

C Melissa MinerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4032-3846
Jennifer L BurnafordDepartment of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton, California, United States of America.
Richard F AmbroseDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Liam AntrimOlympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary, Port Angeles, Washington, United States of America.
Heath BohlmannPadilla Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Padilla Bay, Washington, United States of America.
Carol A BlanchetteValentine Eastern Sierra Reserves, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
John M EngleMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Steven C FradkinOlympic National Park, Port Angeles, Washington, United States of America.
Rani GaddamDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Christopher D G HarleyDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Benjamin G MinerDepartment of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, United States of America.
Steven N MurrayDepartment of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton, California, United States of America.
Jayson R SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, United States of America.
Stephen G WhitakerChannel Islands National Park, Ventura, California, United States of America.
Peter T RaimondiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
University of California, Santa Cruz · USCalifornia State University, Fullerton · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USCalifornia State Polytechnic University · USNational Marine Sanctuary Foundation · USOlympic Medical Center · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWells National Estuarine Research Reserve · USWestern Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease outbreaks can have substantial impacts on wild populations, but the often patchy or anecdotal evidence of these impacts impedes our ability to understand outbreak dynamics. Recently however, a severe disease outbreak occurred in a group of very well-studied organisms-sea stars along the west coast of North America. We analyzed nearly two decades of data from a coordinated monitoring effort at 88 sites ranging from southern British Columbia to San Diego, California along with 2 sites near Sitka, Alaska to better understand the effects of sea star wasting disease (SSWD) on the keystone intertidal predator, Pisaster ochraceus. Quantitative surveys revealed unprecedented declines of P. ochraceus in 2014 and 2015 across nearly the entire geographic range of the species. The intensity of the impact of SSWD was not uniform across the affected area, with proportionally greater population declines in the southern regions relative to the north. The degree of population decline was unrelated to pre-outbreak P. ochraceus density, although these factors have been linked in other well-documented disease events. While elevated seawater temperatures were not broadly linked to the initial emergence of SSWD, anomalously high seawater temperatures in 2014 and 2015 might have exacerbated the disease's impact. Both before and after the onset of the SSWD outbreak, we documented higher recruitment of P. ochraceus in the north than in the south, and while some juveniles are surviving (as evidenced by transition of recruitment pulses to larger size classes), post-SSWD survivorship is lower than during pre-SSWD periods. In hindsight, our data suggest that the SSWD event defied prediction based on two factors found to be important in other marine disease events, sea water temperature and population density, and illustrate the importance of surveillance of natural populations as one element of an integrated approach to marine disease ecology. Low levels of SSWD-symptomatic sea stars are still present throughout the impacted range, thus the outlook for population recovery is uncertain.

Indexed as

StarfishAlaskaAnimal DiseasesAnimalsPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID29558484
PMCPMC5860697
OpenAlexW2791685702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.