Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558363›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Signal intensity analysis and optimization for in vivo imaging of Cherenkov and excited luminescence.

Ethan P M LaRochelle, Jennifer R Shell, Jason R Gunn, Scott C Davis, Brian W Pogue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid Monte Carlo model for efficient tissue Cherenkov emission estimation to assess changes from beam size, energy and incidence.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tissue pONature communications · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan P M LaRochelleThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States of America.
Jennifer R Shell
Jason R Gunn
Scott C Davis
Brian W Pogue

Funding

OPTICAL CHERENKOV IMAGING DOSIMETRY IN HUMAN RADIOTHERAPYR01EB023909 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLADSTONE, DAVID J., JARVIS, LESLEY A · 2017 to 2024
$4.4M
Fluorescence Imaging to Optimize Cancer TherapyR01CA109558 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI POGUE, BRIAN WILLIAM · 2005 to 2015
$2.8M
Cerenkov excited luminescence sheet imaging (CELSI)R01EB024498 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI POGUE, BRIAN WILLIAM · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
Cerenkov Tomography of 4D Radiation Therapy PlansR21EB017559 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI POGUE, BRIAN WILLIAM · 2013 to 2014
$419k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109558NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023909NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024498NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB017559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in vivo Cherenkov optical emissions can be used as a dosimetry tool or to excite luminescence, termed Cherenkov-excited luminescence (CEL) with microsecond-level time-gated cameras. The goal of this work was to develop a complete theoretical foundation for the detectable signal strength, in order to provide guidance on optimization of the limits of detection and how to optimize near real time imaging. The key parameters affecting photon production, propagation and detection were considered and experimental validation with both tissue phantoms and a murine model are shown. Both the theoretical analysis and experimental data indicate that the detection level is near a single photon-per-pixel for the detection geometry and frame rates commonly used, with the strongest factor being the signal decrease with the square of distance from tissue to camera. Experimental data demonstrates how the SNR improves with increasing integration time, but only up to the point where the dominance of camera read noise is overcome by stray photon noise that cannot be suppressed. For the current camera in a fixed geometry, the signal to background ratio limits the detection of light signals, and the observed in vivo Cherenkov emission is on the order of 100×  stronger than CEL signals. As a result, imaging signals from depths  <15 mm is reasonable for Cherenkov light, and depths  <3 mm is reasonable for CEL imaging. The current investigation modeled Cherenkov and CEL imaging of two oxygen sensing phosphorescent compounds, but the modularity of the code allows for easy comparison of different agents or alternative cameras, geometries or tissues.

Indexed as

LuminescenceOptical ImagingPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID29558363
PMCPMC5920648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.