Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29558243›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology review2018

Towards consensus on fear appeals: a rejoinder to the commentaries on Kok, Peters, Kessels, ten Hoor, and Ruiter (2018).

Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters, Robert A C Ruiter, Gill A Ten Hoor, Loes T E Kessels, Gerjo Kok

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19: the relationship between perceptions of risk and behaviours during lockdown.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Studying Behaviour Change Mechanisms under Complexity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Petersa Department of Methodology & Statistics , Open University of the Netherlands , Heerlen , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-9589
Robert A C Ruiterb Department of Work and Social Psychology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3258
Gill A Ten Hoorb Department of Work and Social Psychology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-1893
Loes T E Kesselsb Department of Work and Social Psychology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8898-4686
Gerjo Kokb Department of Work and Social Psychology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3501-4096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ConsensusPersuasive CommunicationFearHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.