Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557991›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2018

The transcriptomic changes associated with the development of social parasitism in the honeybee Apis mellifera capensis.

Denise Aumer, Fiona N Mumoki, Christian W W Pirk, Robin F A Moritz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the mechanisms underpinning ageing and fecundity in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Inquiline social parasites as tools to unlock the secrets of insect sociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise AumerDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 4, 06099, Halle (Saale), Germany. denise.aumer@zoologie.uni-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-4007
Fiona N MumokiSocial Insect Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
Christian W W PirkSocial Insect Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20 Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
Robin F A MoritzDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 4, 06099, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects are characterized by the division of labor. Queens usually dominate reproduction, whereas workers fulfill non-reproductive age-dependent tasks to maintain the colony. Although workers are typically sterile, they can activate their ovaries to produce their own offspring. In the extreme, worker reproduction can turn into social parasitism as in Apis mellifera capensis. These intraspecific parasites occupy a host colony, kill the resident queen, and take over the reproductive monopoly. Because they exhibit a queenlike behavior and are also treated like queens by the fellow workers, they are so-called pseudoqueens. Here, we compare the development of parasitic pseudoqueens and social workers at different time points using fat body transcriptome data. Two complementary analysis methods-a principal component analysis and a time course analysis-led to the identification of a core set of genes involved in the transition from a social worker into a highly fecund parasitic pseudoqueen. Comparing our results on pseudoqueens with gene expression data of honeybee queens revealed many similarities. In addition, there was a set of specific transcriptomic changes in the parasitic pseudoqueens that differed from both, queens and social workers, which may be typical for the development of the social parasitism in A. m. capensis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesFemaleHierarchy, SocialReproductionTranscriptomeApis mellifera capensisPseudoqueenReproductive dominanceSocial parasitismThelytokyWorker reproduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.