Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557943›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of gastroenterology2018

Discontinuing Long-Term PPI Therapy: Why, With Whom, and How?

Laura Targownik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Economic and treatment burden among newly diagnosed patients with erosive esophagitis in the US: a national retrospective cohort study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  6. Integrated models of population pharmacokinetics and exposure response to optimize dosage regimen for anaprazole sodium in duodenal ulcer.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura TargownikSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady School of Medicine at University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used class of drugs prescribed over the long term in all of clinical medicine with 8-10% of ambulatory adults have been prescribed a PPI in the past 30 days. However, numerous studies have raised doubts about the long term safety of PPI use. The purpose of this review is threefold: (i) To provide an overview of the current evidence demonstrating associations between PPI use and adverse health outcomes and the likelihood of the associations being causal (Why?); (ii) To be able to identify long-term PPI users in whom the intensity of PPI therapy could be reduced or in whom PPIs could be eliminated outright (Who?); and (iii) To provide strategies on how to reduce or stop chronic PPI therapy while maintaining symptom control and reducing the risk for symptom or upper GI disease recurrence (How?).

Indexed as

Patient SelectionWithholding TreatmentConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansProton Pump InhibitorsStatistics as TopicTime FactorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29557943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.